Please Answer the question ASAP!!! (Under 10 minutes max) I will leave you thumbs up if you respond immediately and answer each part correctly!!!

Answer the multiple choice:

Question 2 0.25 pts After living in his house for 25 years, Stockton listed it for sale. During negotiations, the Buyer mentioned that there was a leaky faucet in the bathroom. Stockton promised that he would fix it before the sale was completed. The final written contract of sale signed by both parties contained an integration clause, but Stockton's promise to fix the faucet was not included in the written agreement. After the sale, the Buyer sued Stockton for the cost of the repair, claiming breach of contract. Which of the following is Stockton's best legal defense? The Statute of Frauds requires contracts for the sale of real property interests to be in writing. He could not find a plumber who would do the repair for a reasonable price. The oral promise is parol evidence and it is excluded from the contract by the integration clause. Leaky faucets are a fact of life in old houses. By signing the contract of sale, he delegated his responsibility to the Buyer