Please answer the questions for BOTH articles.

Dawson, E., Hartwig, M., Brimbal, L., & Denisenkov, P. (2017). A room with a view: Setting influences information disclosure in investigative interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000244

Normile, C. J., & Scherr, K. C. (2018). Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess. Law and human behavior, 42(6), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000306

1. Is the title specific enough, yet concise?

2. Is the purpose of the study clear in the abstract?

3. Is the size of the sample appropriate? (In other words, is there sufficient power)

4. Are the participants properly selected? (Is the sample representative of its intended population and not biased? In other words, is the selection process appropriate and will the results be generalizable?)

5. Are the statistical tests appropriate, and are the assumptions for their use met? (Are the degrees of freedom calculated correctly and the error measures valid? Are there errors in calculation of statistical results?)

6. Are recommendations given for future research or changes in practice? Do these extend directly from the results?

7. Are the results consistent with the hypothesis?

8. Are all the key terms and concepts directly or operationally defined?