Please answer these two discussion questions!

CASE FOR ANALYSIS Schering-Plough Implements a New Global Strategy and Structure One global company that found itself in trouble in the 2000s because of the way its structure and control systems were working was pharmaceutical maker Schering- Plough. In 2003. Schering was under pressures from many fronts. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was de- manding a complete overhaul of its global manufacturing plants to increase and protect drug quality, and the patent on Claritin, its best-selling drug, was running out and it had few new products in the pipeline. Thus on both the quality and innovation dimensions, major sources of a dif- ferentiation advantage, the company's strategy was in trouble. Schering-Plough's board of directors recruited Fred Hassan, a Pakistan-born Harvard MBA, to turn the com- pany around. After meeting with hundreds of groups of managers and scientists, and visiting the company's oper- ations around the globe, Hassan began to realize that the company's main problems stemmed from its global strat- egy and structure, Over time, the company had developed a multidomes- tic approach to planning its global value-chain activities and it had divided its activities up into world regions, where essentially each world region acted as the product group that made decisions inside its world region/group. The problem was that each of the heads of the regional groups had gained a near total control of their operations, so each world region was doing things such as manufactur- ing and marketing and sales in its own unique way. As a re- sult, managers at corporate headquarters, and especially its top-management team, were not getting accurate infor- mation about the way each region, and especially the country operations within each region, were performing, And major drug quality problems had arisen because the corporate center didn't find out about the problems at the country level until a long time after they had occurred because of all the bureaucracy that had emerged at the level of the regional groups. Schering only makes one major type of product- drugs--so Hassan decided it did not need separate world- wide product groups or separate regional groups. He decided to slash the number of levels in the company's global corporate hierarchy, eliminating all the layers be- tween the country managers and himself. The heads of CASE FOR ANALYSIS Schering-Plough Implements a New Global Strategy and Structure One global company that found itself in trouble in the 2000s because of the way its structure and control systems were working was pharmaceutical maker Schering- Plough. In 2003. Schering was under pressures from many fronts. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was de- manding a complete overhaul of its global manufacturing plants to increase and protect drug quality, and the patent on Claritin, its best-selling drug, was running out and it had few new products in the pipeline. Thus on both the quality and innovation dimensions, major sources of a dif- ferentiation advantage, the company's strategy was in trouble. Schering-Plough's board of directors recruited Fred Hassan, a Pakistan-born Harvard MBA, to turn the com- pany around. After meeting with hundreds of groups of managers and scientists, and visiting the company's oper- ations around the globe, Hassan began to realize that the company's main problems stemmed from its global strat- egy and structure, Over time, the company had developed a multidomes- tic approach to planning its global value-chain activities and it had divided its activities up into world regions, where essentially each world region acted as the product group that made decisions inside its world region/group. The problem was that each of the heads of the regional groups had gained a near total control of their operations, so each world region was doing things such as manufactur- ing and marketing and sales in its own unique way. As a re- sult, managers at corporate headquarters, and especially its top-management team, were not getting accurate infor- mation about the way each region, and especially the country operations within each region, were performing, And major drug quality problems had arisen because the corporate center didn't find out about the problems at the country level until a long time after they had occurred because of all the bureaucracy that had emerged at the level of the regional groups. Schering only makes one major type of product- drugs--so Hassan decided it did not need separate world- wide product groups or separate regional groups. He decided to slash the number of levels in the company's global corporate hierarchy, eliminating all the layers be- tween the country managers and himself. The heads of