Please assist to answer this question based on the below summary of the article looking at the Kantian ethics theories, Bjork$$Schwartz methodology and PRESCIENT scenario analysis and other ethical legislatives in Chinese government.

What were the significant ethical harms that the Chinese government was concerned about when Google started operating in their market? How did they deal with those concerns and who were the stakeholders who were thought could be harmed, and how?

The document discusses Google's Code of Conduct, its core principles of serving users, and the company's approach to the Chinese market, including the challenges of censorship, the Chinese government's control of Internet content, and the internal division within Google's leadership regarding its China policy.

In "A New Approach to China: Google and Censorship in the Chinese Market," the case discusses the dilemma faced by Google's leadership in $2010$ regarding the renewal of the company's local Chinese domain license $($Google$.$cn$).$ The narrative contextualizes Google's entry into the Chinese market, outlining the background of Google as a company and the broader socio$-$political landscape of China. It delves into the intricacies of China's Internet control mechanisms, the country's economic development, and the specific challenges faced by Google in adhering to its corporate principles, particularly its "Don't be evil" motto, in the face of Chinese regulations. The case highlights the friction between Google and the Chinese government, stemming from issues such as cyber$-$attacks, censorship, and privacy concerns. Moreover, it presents the contrasting viewpoints within Google's leadership, particularly between Eric Schmidt and the company's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, regarding the company's China policy. The document also features a planning document outlining the priorities and BATNA $($Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement$)$ for addressing the issues at hand.

The case commences with a description of the events leading up to the $2010$ dilemma, providing insights into the history of Google, the background of its founders, and the company's growth and expansion into the international market, including China. It elucidates the complexities of the Chinese market, including the government's control of Internet content, the Great Firewall, and the role of government monitors and citizen volunteers in regulating online information. Furthermore, the document presents Google's various revenue sources, market share in China, and the company's expansion of services in the Chinese market. It also offers excerpts from Google's Code of Conduct, emphasizing the company's commitment to serving its users, honesty, responsiveness, taking action, and obeying the law.

In addition to delving into Google's market share and revenue development, the case addresses the specific challenges and instances of friction between Google and the Chinese government. It discusses the cyber$-$attacks on Google, the company's decision to stop censoring search results in China, and the subsequent redirection of Google.cn users to Google's Hong Kong site. The planning document outlines the priorities and BATNA for addressing the issues at hand, including cyber$-$spying and hacker attacks, privacy concerns, censorship of Google's services, and Google's presence in the Chinese market. These discussions lead to the pivotal decision$-$making process faced by Google's leadership as they navigate the complexities of the Chinese market and the company's corporate principles.

Overall, the case provides a comprehensive overview of the intricate challenges faced by Google in the Chinese market, shedding light on the ethical and strategic considerations involved in the company's approach to censorship, privacy, and government regulations, ultimately culminating in the decision$-$making process regarding the renewal of Google's Chinese domain license.