Please comment on the below post and add in text citation and referencesno older than 5 years

Reflection on Employee Selection Experience

During my application process for a role at Columbia Sportswear Company, the employee selection process covered several key steps: a web-based software, a resume screening, a dependent interview, and a brief task-related situational judgment test. Based on the ideas mentioned in Chapter 6, which emphasize the importance of reliability and validity in the selection process, I believe that certain components were stronger than others.

The structured interview was relatively valid because the questions had been specifically activity-associated (e.g., customer support scenarios, dealing with extensive retail environments). Structured interviews typically have better content validity and inter-rater reliability, especially whilst multiple interviewers assess the same candidate. However, the situational take a look at becomes short and lacks clear scoring criteria, which may lower its predictive validity.

One development I might propose is the inclusion of a practical job preview (RJP), which helps ensure criterion-associated validity by giving candidates an extra correct concept of process expectancies and surroundings. This may help improve the applicant process and decrease early turnover.

In summary, while the general selection system confirmed a few strengths in terms of structure and relevance, improving test standardization and imparting an RJP ought to further improve its reliability and validity, aligning higher with proof-based choice practices from Chapter 6