PLEASE DO NOT PLAGIARIZE OR USE AI USE YOUR OWN WORDS

Read this article https://pgcconline.instructure.com/courses/29985/assignments/622356?module_item_id=2956384

Watch the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dfW8OAO1mo

1.) Categorize Your Evidence:

• Based on what you have learned from the case, list all the circumstantial evidence you would use at trial. Consider the logical connections the jury will need to make to conclude that the defendant is guilty. Use the categories below to organize your evidence:

2. Testimonial Evidence (Occurrence and Expert Witnesses) (50-100 words):

• List witnesses who were present at key moments related to the case. These could be individuals who had interactions with the defendant or the victim before or after the murder, or who can testify to the defendant's behavior or whereabouts.
• Identify forensic experts or specialists who would testify about the scientific or technical aspects of the evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, digital forensics, or autopsy results.

3. Real Evidence (Tangible, Scientific, and Documentary) (50-100 words):

• Include any physical items recovered during the investigation, such as objects found at the crime scene, weapons, or personal belongings of the victim or defendant.
• This includes forensic evidence, such as DNA, fingerprints, or phone records. Discuss how this evidence was gathered and how it connects the defendant to the crime.
• Include written or recorded material, such as text messages, emails, surveillance footage, or any documents that demonstrate motive or link the defendant to the crime.

4. Demonstrative Evidence - Helps the Jury Visualize Key Elements of the Case (50 - 100 words):

1. • Describe any visual aids or models you would like the jury to see, such as maps, timelines, or diagrams that illustrate the relationship between the victim and defendant, or the sequence of events leading to the murder.

5.) Connect the Evidence (50-100 words):

• Write a brief summary explaining (motive, means, and opportunity) how this circumstantial evidence forms a cohesive narrative. How do all the pieces fit together, like a jigsaw puzzle, to point to the defendant's guilt? Be sure to highlight:
  • What was the defendant's reason for committing the crime? How do you prove this without direct evidence?
  • Show that the defendant had the chance to commit the crime based on timelines or physical presence.
  • Demonstrate that the defendant had the ability or tools to carry out the crime.

Note: No evidence can be presented without a witness to explain its relevance. Be sure to identify who will introduce each evidence in court and why it matters.

You are not required to delve into the additional case links at the bottom of the article but feel free to explore them if you wish to strengthen your argument.