Please explain each question in great detail.

• Consider the three approaches to constitutional interpretation, (original intent, drawing a line, and balancing the government's needs versus the individuals rights )
• What challenges arise when applying each of these approaches to the Fourth Amendment specifically? Provide an example, either from a case you read or from your imagination, of how these approaches can prove difficult for judges and courts to apply.
• Which of these three approaches do you think is the most difficult to apply today? Why?
• Which of these three approaches do you think is the best approach? Why?