please help correct this post

Please share the APA-formatted (as best you can) research evidence reference andpermalinkfrom the Chamberlain Library that you found to support your PPE.Iam unconcerned about a hanging indent and double spacing in this discussion platform. Thankyou!

APA general housekeeping: For everyone's information. Books should not be used asyouroutside sources as they are not primarysources. Journals that contain up-to-date peer-reviewed research and canbe foundin the Chamberlain Library are an ideal resource.

Paraphrasing is always preferred. A page number with quotation marksis requiredfor a direct quote. As a matter of interest,Ihave included APA information about Numbers (Sections 6.32- 6.39, pp. 178-181). As a general rule, writeoutthe word for the number to express numbers 0 to 9 and any number that begins a sentence. Use Arabic numerals for numbers10or greater. ...difference between the 2 is that..difference between the twois that...

Quantitative research involves dealing with numerical data and statistical analysis. For instance, a study that measures the effectiveness of a new drug by comparing the recovery rates of two groups, one receiving the drug and the other a placebo, is a classic example of quantitative research. It is objective and aims to measure data and generalize results from a sample to the population of interest. On the other hand, qualitative research involves non-numerical data. For example, a study that explores the experiences and perceptions of patients with a chronic illness through in-depth interviews is typical qualitative research. It is subjective and focuses on understanding the meaning individuals or groups attribute to a social or human problem (Houser, 2018). In terms of method, quantitative research uses structured and standardized methods such as surveys, structured interviews, observations, and experiments (Polit & Beck, 2018). In contrast, qualitative research uses semi-structured or unstructured methods like interviews, observations, focus groups, and case studies (Houser, 2018).

One study design that capturedmyaIfound a relevant journal article to support the proposal for implementing a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to investigate the efficacy of oral suctioning and the VAP bundle compared to current practices for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in elderly ICU patients.

This design is often used in quantitative research and is considered the gold standard for clinical trials(Houser, 2018).Its rigorous process of randomly assigning participants to an experimental or a control group, where the experimental group receives the intervention and the control group does not, allows forcomparingoutcomes. This design's meticulous approach, which helps minimize bias and ensures the validity of the results, instills confidence in the robustness of the findings. The reliability and trustworthiness of this design make it a valuable tool in clinical research (Houser, 2018).

In response to the week3assessment of the priorityclinical nursing problem of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in elderly ICU patients, I propose the implementation of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to investigate the efficacy of oral suctioning and the VAP bundle compared to current practices. The outcomes of this study could significantly influence clinical protocols, potentially leading to enhanced patient outcomes and reduced healthcare expenses. Participants wouldbe randomly assignedto either the intervention group (receiving oral suctioning and the VAP bundle) or the control group (receiving current practices). The primary outcome measured would be the occurrence of VAP over3months. Implementing an RCT enables a direct comparison between the intervention and the control, providing compelling evidence of the intervention's effectiveness. Moreover, the random assignment of participants helps mitigate the influence of confounding variables, thereby bolstering the credibility of the findings (Houser, 2018).).

References:

American Association of Colleges of Nurses. (2008). Executive Summary: The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice.

Connelly, L. (2021). Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Medsurg Nursing, 30(3), 218.

Houser, J. (2023).Nursing Research: Reading, Using, and Creating Evidence(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

QSEN Institute. (2020). QSEN Competencies.

Stricklin, S. M. (2012). Exploring Perceptions of the Ability of Student Nurses to Achieve Learning Outcomes in Community-Based Psychiatric Mental Health Clinical Settings. https://core.ac.uk/download/213399222.pdf