please help me answer this

2000 word count

Using Coca cola company

Ethical theories are below

Individual factors are below

Situationsl factors are below

an independent ethics consultant, asked to analyse, and advise on, one of below vignette cases in report format1 In your report, you are expected to do the following: Explain the ethical issue(s) of your chosen case (see below) using references (textbooks, journal articles etc.). Explain which stakeholder groups are involved in | affected by this issue and how. Do not copy the case description, instead, summarise and analyse as taught in class (400-500 words). (20%) Use TWO ethical theories (see lectures Learning Weeks 2 and 3) to justify why this issue / these issues deserve(s) attention (400-500 words) (20%) Set out any THREE individual or situational factors (see lecture Learning Week 4] that explain why the ethical issues described in the case occurred (150-250 words). (10%) Provide THREE TO FOUR specific recommendations as to how this issue / these issues may be addressed effectively. Please provide recommendations to at least two key stakeholders, one of which should be the company that is the focus of your analysis. Where possible, point out the links or complementarities between the solutions you suggest. Where appropriate, link your suggestions to general business ethics management tools (see, for example, Crane et al. 2019, ch. 5) (550-650 words) (30%) Provide a critical evaluation of your recommendations, i.e., show the limitations of what you have proposed and/or explain what else might need to be put in place to overcome the limitations of your proposed recommendations. (200-300 words). (10%) Your report should have a brief introduction (setting out what you are planning to cover in the report). Your evaluation can be your conclusion, but you may also write a separate conclusion Your word limit is 2,000 words (excluding bibliography and word count in appendices). 10% below or above allowed. Do not forget to include your word count in your report. The report needs to have a minimum of five references (theory and case related That Ethical Theory Focus . Consequences Utilitarianism Outcomes of an action Ethics of duty Deontology/Kantianism Ethics of Rights Ethics of Care Intrinsic Rightness and wrongness of an action D Virtue Ethics Character of the decision-maker (Individual/Collective), the good life Processes of ethical decision making . Discourse Ethics How to use ethical theories in coursework Utilitarianism: assess the benefit/harms of the current situation for each affected stakeholder and draw some conclusion as to how Utilitarianism does or does NOT justify what currently happens Kantian Ethics Kantian ethics: assess to what extent the current situation meets the Categorical Imperative criteria of universally acceptable (e.g. what would happen if everyone acted according to this principle, can every rational human being accept this principle?) and respect for persons are other people treated as an end in themselves, not just a means) Ethics of rights List what main rights are affected in the case study and whose rights they are. Explain which right(s) definitely need to be respected and protected and why. Explain whose responsibility is to protect/respect those rights FI Virtue ethics: assess to what extent in current situation Specific virtues are lacking, refer to ideas of a virtuous organisation and to human flourishing and well-being DE DOING 2 230 Ethics of Care What kind of relationship do the involved parties find themselves in? What does it mean in this case to have a 'caring' attitude? How can harm be avoided? Which solution is most likely to preserve healthy and harmonious relationships among those involved? (How can those being cared for be empowered) Discourse Ethics Discourse ethics: apply in your 'recommendations' section: What does it mean to involve affected parties in decision-making process in this case (who should be involved in the dialogue and why?) What are the chances of an open and fair dialogue? What norms/solution might be generated? . Individual factors include: Age and gender Personal values (including stemming from religion) Personal integrity (character) Education and Employment Psychological factors (cognitive moral development, locus of control) National and cultural characteristics Situational factors include: . . moral intensity of the issue moral framing organisational structures and culture . an independent ethics consultant, asked to analyse, and advise on, one of below vignette cases in report format1 In your report, you are expected to do the following: Explain the ethical issue(s) of your chosen case (see below) using references (textbooks, journal articles etc.). Explain which stakeholder groups are involved in | affected by this issue and how. Do not copy the case description, instead, summarise and analyse as taught in class (400-500 words). (20%) Use TWO ethical theories (see lectures Learning Weeks 2 and 3) to justify why this issue / these issues deserve(s) attention (400-500 words) (20%) Set out any THREE individual or situational factors (see lecture Learning Week 4] that explain why the ethical issues described in the case occurred (150-250 words). (10%) Provide THREE TO FOUR specific recommendations as to how this issue / these issues may be addressed effectively. Please provide recommendations to at least two key stakeholders, one of which should be the company that is the focus of your analysis. Where possible, point out the links or complementarities between the solutions you suggest. Where appropriate, link your suggestions to general business ethics management tools (see, for example, Crane et al. 2019, ch. 5) (550-650 words) (30%) Provide a critical evaluation of your recommendations, i.e., show the limitations of what you have proposed and/or explain what else might need to be put in place to overcome the limitations of your proposed recommendations. (200-300 words). (10%) Your report should have a brief introduction (setting out what you are planning to cover in the report). Your evaluation can be your conclusion, but you may also write a separate conclusion Your word limit is 2,000 words (excluding bibliography and word count in appendices). 10% below or above allowed. Do not forget to include your word count in your report. The report needs to have a minimum of five references (theory and case related That Ethical Theory Focus . Consequences Utilitarianism Outcomes of an action Ethics of duty Deontology/Kantianism Ethics of Rights Ethics of Care Intrinsic Rightness and wrongness of an action D Virtue Ethics Character of the decision-maker (Individual/Collective), the good life Processes of ethical decision making . Discourse Ethics How to use ethical theories in coursework Utilitarianism: assess the benefit/harms of the current situation for each affected stakeholder and draw some conclusion as to how Utilitarianism does or does NOT justify what currently happens Kantian Ethics Kantian ethics: assess to what extent the current situation meets the Categorical Imperative criteria of universally acceptable (e.g. what would happen if everyone acted according to this principle, can every rational human being accept this principle?) and respect for persons are other people treated as an end in themselves, not just a means) Ethics of rights List what main rights are affected in the case study and whose rights they are. Explain which right(s) definitely need to be respected and protected and why. Explain whose responsibility is to protect/respect those rights FI Virtue ethics: assess to what extent in current situation Specific virtues are lacking, refer to ideas of a virtuous organisation and to human flourishing and well-being DE DOING 2 230 Ethics of Care What kind of relationship do the involved parties find themselves in? What does it mean in this case to have a 'caring' attitude? How can harm be avoided? Which solution is most likely to preserve healthy and harmonious relationships among those involved? (How can those being cared for be empowered) Discourse Ethics Discourse ethics: apply in your 'recommendations' section: What does it mean to involve affected parties in decision-making process in this case (who should be involved in the dialogue and why?) What are the chances of an open and fair dialogue? What norms/solution might be generated? . Individual factors include: Age and gender Personal values (including stemming from religion) Personal integrity (character) Education and Employment Psychological factors (cognitive moral development, locus of control) National and cultural characteristics Situational factors include: . . moral intensity of the issue moral framing organisational structures and culture