Question: PLEASE HELP ME EXPLAIN WHY THESE QUESTIONS COME TO THOSE ANSWERS. PLEASE EXPLAIN. Scenario 1 : Suppose the city of Springfield has only one gas
PLEASE HELP ME EXPLAIN WHY THESE QUESTIONS COME TO THOSE ANSWERS. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
Scenario 1: Suppose the city of Springfield has only one gas station, which is owned by a single firm. The demand for gasoline in Springfield is given by the inverse demand function:
p=400 - 2.5Q
where Q is gallons of gas demanded and p is the price charged per gallon of gas. The wholesale price of gas is $10/gallon and there is a fixed cost of $200 of running the gas station. Therefore, the firm's cost function is:
C(Q)=10Q + 200
- As a monopoly, what price and quantity would the firm set?
p = ____205_____ Q = ______78________
- How much profit does the monopolist make?
= ____15,010______
- What is the deadweight loss resulting from having the monopoly?
DWL = ___7605___
To lower food prices on campus, the university decides to allow two separate firms to compete. Assume the two firms each have the same cost function as above.
- If the firms compete as Cournot Duopolists, what is Firm 1's Best Response Function?
q1BR = ____(390-2.5q2)/5_________
- What will be the Cournot Duopoly equilibrium quantities of soda sold and price of soda?
q1 = ____52______ q2 = _____52_________ p = ______140_______
- How much profit does each firm make?
1 = ___6560________ 2 = _____6560_______
- What is the deadweight loss from the Duopoly?
DWL = ____3380_____
Suppose the owners of Firm 1 and Firm 2 decide to form a cartel, with each firm selling an equal amount of food.
- What price and quantity of soda will they choose to sell if they seek to maximize the combined profits?
q1 = _____39_______ q2 = _______39_______ p = ______205______
- If Firm 1 believes Firm 2 will adhere to the cartel agreement, what output level maximizes Firm 1's profit? In other words, what would be firm 1's best response?
q1 = __58.5________
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
