Please help me make these for my case study

1.) Significant Case Facts - these are information that can be seen in the case that could lead to the determination of the problem. You can cite important points seen in the case.

2.)Analysis of ACA's - you could do cost-benefit analysis (optional) or for each ACA you can determine their advantages and disadvantages if the ACA will be applied in solving the problem.

***Here's the Case Study ****

Designing for Dollars

Great product design is absolutely critical for most consumer products companies. But how do these companies know when a design feature will pay off, especially when every dollar counts? How do they make those tough decisions? That's the challenge that faced Whirlpool's chief designer, Chuck Jones. He knew he had to come up with a better way.

Chuck's realization that the whole process of making design decisions needed to be improved came after a meeting with Whirlpool's resource allocation team. Chuck wanted to add some ornamentation to a KitchenAid refrigerator that was being redesigned, but it would have added about $5 in extra cost. When the team asked him to estimate the return on investment (that is, would it pay off financially to add this cost?), he couldn't give them any data. His "trust me, I'm a designer" argument didn't sway them either. Chuck resolved to improve the approach to investing in design.

His first step was to survey other "design-centric" companies, including BMW, Nike, and Nokia, Surprisingly, only a few had a system for forecasting return on design. Most of them simply based future investments on past performance. Chuck said, "No one had reallyfigured this stuft out.* With so many smart talented people in the field, why had no one been able to come up with a good way to make those decisions? According to two accounting professors, one reason is that it's incredibly difficult to discern design's contribution from all the other business functions (marketing, manufacturing, distribution, etc.). And even the design profession couldn't agree on how to approach this problem. Despite the obstacles, Chuck continued his quest to find a way to objectively measure the benefits of design.

What he eventually concluded was that a focus on customer preferences would work better than a focus on bottom-line returns. If his team could objectively measure what customers want in a product and then meet those needs, the company could realize financial returns. Chuck's design team created a standardized company wide process that puts design prototypes in front of customer focus groups and then gets detailed measurements of their preferences about aesthetics, craftsmanship, technical performance, ergonomics, and usability. They chart the results against competing products and the company's own products. This metrics-based approach gives decision makers a baseline of objective evidence fromwhich to make investment decisions. Design Investment decisions are now based on fact, not opinion. The "new" decision-making approach has transformed the company's culture and led to bolder designs because the designers can now make a strong ease for making those investments.