PLEASE HELP ME PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON MY CLASSMATES POST USING THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES

in responding to your peers' posts, reflect on diverse defenses in internet tort cases.PROVIDE REFRENCE LINKS

RYAN POSTED

Tort Laws are a set of laws that provide solutions to people who have been wronged (Legal Dictionary, 2015). This can include compensation through legal repercussions such as suing someone for defamation or violating someone's right to privacy. They are helpful in protecting against an invasion of privacy as they provide a legal option when someone's personal information has been misused without the user's consent. Some activity that torts provide protection against include defamation, infliction of emotional distress, the right to privacy, and public slander that is causing harm (Mullen, 2018). Traditional torts and internet torts cover many similar topics, so any form of harassment, whether online or publicly, can be refuted by tort laws.

An example of a difference between an internet tort and traditional torts is how defamation cases are handled, and their effect on the victim. A traditional tort case is someone such as a paparazzi snapping a photo of a celebrity on their property. This would fall under the intrusion upon seclusion, which can be pursued under tort law. An internet tort is when someone's data is exposed and spreads across the internet, such as leaking explicit photos online, and the hacker's whereabouts and identity are unknown. Even though the cases would be essentially the same, the different mediums they occurred in make it a complicated matter to resolve with torts. The paparazzi can be easily identified, but an online hacker is harder to track, providing different complexities for how to proceed with a tort law.

However, internet torts do have limitations. It can be hard to identify the other party, as online users tend to use nicknames/usernames, making it hard to determine the offending party and hold them accountable, such as social media users posting misinformation (mjlst, 2024). Some cases become unclear due to local laws differing from where the other party is located, making any tort messy when it comes to cross-border situations. It can be hard to identify the other party, as online users tend to use nicknames/usernames, making it hard to determine the offending party. There is also the limitation of the internet being a constantly evolving place, so an internet tort may be outdated regarding new tools used in certain offenses. These reasons can lead to internet torts being limited in the capabilities they provide for people who were wronged.

Despite these limitations, people can find ways to protect themselves. Users can take a proactive approach to their security, which can prevent situations where they need an internet tort. A simple method is to use strong privacy settings such as multi-factor authentication, and to report any issues or cases of clear violations of a person's reputation. It is also important to be aware of what you are posting online, as this can lead to people having fuel to fan the flames any defamation accusations. These steps can help to further protect themselves in the cases of internet torts being unable to cover them due to limitations.