please help me to do more concise this Short Answer focus on a single sentence from each of the three legal authorities in your memorandum, citing to each.

The enforceability of the prenuptial agreement between Samantha Percolet and Eugene Percolet is questionable. Under Florida Statute Chapter 61.079, the deal is likely to be deemed unenforceable due to lack of time to review the contract, lack of complete financial information, possible duress or coercion given the health circumstances of Samantha Percolet's pregnancy and that they were in a foreign country in the presence of their family and friends and the day after the wedding on which the contract was signed. Circumstances similar to those in the case of Ziegler v. Natera,279 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019), where the antenuptial agreement was deemed invalid due to duress, as there was no full financial disclosure and time pressure, which contributed to the pressure regarding the request to sign the deal, and Ms. Natera's pregnancy. Circumstances differ from those in the case of Francavilla v. Francavilla,969 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), where the antenuptial agreement was valid, without duress, primarily due to the extended negotiation period, full disclosure of financial assets, and the opportunity for the Wife to consult with and prepare the deal in consultation with her attorney.