Please help review and edit per evaluators comments:

Task Directions:

B. literature review of your curriculum technology proposal on the use of technology in education by doing the following:

1. Complete the literature review summary table in the attached "C922 Curriculum Technology Proposal Template" using five peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years that support your curriculum technology proposal. Include your literature review summary table as Table 1, and reference Table 1 in the narrative where the literature review findings are discussed.

Grading Rubric:

Competent

The literature review summary table provides 5 peer-reviewed articles published within the last 5 years that support the curriculum technology proposal. The literature review summary table is accurate. The articles referenced in the narrative portion of the literature review are included in the literature review summary table, and the table is provided and referenced as Table 1 in the curriculum proposal.

Evaluators comments:

Evaluator Comments: Attempt 1

The submission provides a Literature Review Summary Table containing peer-reviewed scholarly sources from 2019-2021. However, the response is insufficient because the table contains inaccuracies.

The additional author's last names and journal name are missing for the Shin et al. (2019) integrative review.

The context for the Shin et al. (2019) source is inaccurate.

The additional author's last names and journal name are missing for the Chen et al. (2020) meta-analysis.

The context for the Chen et al. (2020) source is inaccurate.

The journal name is missing for the Huddle (2019) reflective overview.

The level of evidence for the Huddle (2019) reflective overview is inaccurately identified as level I.

The article title is incomplete for the Foronda et al. (2020) systematic review.

The journal name is missing for the Foronda et al. (2020) systematic review.

The level of evidence for the Foronda et al. (2020) systematic review is inaccurately identified as level VII.

The context for the Foronda et al. (2020) systematic review is inaccurate.

The additional author, article title, and journal name are missing for the Shorey and Ng (2021) systematic review.

My Work:

Table1: Literature Review Summary Table

Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Sources Published in Past 5 Years that Support the Proposed Curriculum Technology (author(s)/date/title/journal)	Summary of Relevance to the Proposed Curriculum Technology	Evidence Strength Level I-VII
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 1 (Shin, 2019) Educational Characteristics of Virtual Simulation in Nursing: An Integrative Review	PurposeTo outline the characteristics of virtual simulation in nursing education. ContextA mixed-methods review, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analyses, examining the role of virtual simulation in nursing. Findings The educational components of nursing virtual simulation need to be clearly defined to create effective teaching strategies. The educational benefits of virtual simulation were realized through a combination of virtual and real-world methods to enhance learning. Well-designed nursing virtual simulations can result in successful learning outcomes. RelevanceVirtual simulation is a valuable tool for improving the learning experiences of nursing students.	Level 1 Integrative review, encompassing various research designs. Strengths: Utilizes both experimental and non-experimental studies. Weaknesses: Issues with accuracy, potential bias, or lack of rigor.
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 2 (Chen, 2020) Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-analysis	Purpose To assess the impact of virtual reality (VR) on nursing education. Context Quantitative, randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of VR in nursing education. Findings Virtual reality was found to be more effective than traditional controlled environments in enhancing knowledge. However, there was no significant difference between VR and traditional methods in terms of skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance. Relevance An analysis of the application of virtual reality in nursing education.	Level I Strengths:Provides precise evidence of effectiveness. Weaknesses:The data may lack homogeneity.
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 3 (Huddle, 2019) Benefits, Concerns, and Prospective Use of Technology Within Nursing Education	PurposeTo offer a comprehensive and reflective overview of the advantages, challenges, and future potential of technology in nursing education. ContextAn expert opinion review discussing the benefits, challenges, and future potential of technology in nursing education. Findings Benefit: Technology enhances educational accessibility. Concerns: Financial burden associated with acquiring and maintaining technology. Prospects: Opportunities to modernize nursing education, improving educational practices and policies. RelevanceExamines the role and significance of technology in educational institutions, focusing on its impact on educational facilities, nurse educators, and nursing students.	Level I Strengths: Evidence supports VR's usefulness for knowledge and skill acquisition and retention. Weaknesses: Additional studies are required to compare VR with face-to-face learning in terms of performance improvement.
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 4 (Foronda, 2020) Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Spanning 1996-2018	PurposeTo offer a comprehensive and reflective overview of the advantages, challenges, and future potential of technology in nursing education. ContextAn expert opinion review discussing the benefits, challenges, and future potential of technology in nursing education. Findings Benefit: Technology enhances educational accessibility. Concerns: Financial burden associated with acquiring and maintaining technology. Prospects: Opportunities to modernize nursing education, improving educational practices and policies. RelevanceExamines the role and significance of technology in educational institutions, focusing on its impact on educational facilities, nurse educators, and nursing students.	Level VII Strengths: Based on expert opinion. Weaknesses: Lacks quantitative or qualitative research data.
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 5 (Shorey, 2021)	PurposeTo determine the impact of virtual simulation on nursing students' learning outcomes. ContextA systematic review examining how virtual simulation affects nursing students' learning outcomes. Findings The majority of evidence indicates that virtual simulation enhances learning outcomes. Some studies noted that technical issues disrupted the learning experience. RelevanceTo provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of virtual simulation in improving learning outcomes.	Level I Strengths: High transparency, accuracy, replicability, and reduced risk of bias. Weaknesses: Potential errors in the scientific research.

Reference page:

Asirifi, M. A., Ogilvie, L., Barton, S., Bilash, O., Stobart, K., Aniteye, P., & Aziato, L. (2022). Reflections on change theory and community-based participatory action research: Congruent, similar, or different? Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 12(3), 11-21.

Barrow, J. M., Annamaraju, P., & Toney-Butler, T. J. (2022). Change management. In StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459380/

Chen, H. J., Liao, L. L., Chang, Y. C., Hung, C. C., & Chang, L. C. (2019). Factors influencing technology integration in the curriculum for Taiwanese health profession educators: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142602

Foronda, C. L., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C. N., & Henry, M. N. (2020). Virtual simulation in nursing education: A systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018. Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), 46-54.

Huddle, C. (2019). Benefits, concerns, and prospective use of technology within nursing education. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 14(3).

Koukourikos, K., Tsaloglidou, A., Kourkouta, L., Papathanasiou, I. V., Iliadis, C., Fratzana, A., & Panagiotou, A. (2021). Simulation in clinical nursing education. Acta Informatica Medica: AIM: Journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina, 29(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20

Padilha, J. M., Machado, P. P., Ribeiro, A., Ramos, J., & Costa, P. (2019). Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e11529. https://doi.org/10.2196/11529

Shin, H., Rim, D., Kim, H., Park, S., & Shon, S. (2019). Educational characteristics of virtual simulation in nursing: An integrative review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 37, 18-28.

Shorey, S., & Ng, E. D. (2021). The use of virtual reality simulation among nursing students and registered nurses: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 98, 104662.