please help s soon as possible

In a survey, 38% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 210 pet owners and discovered that 75 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the a = 0.1 level of significance. Because npo (1 - Po ) = 10, the sample size is 5% of the population size, and the sample the requirements for testing the hypothesis satisfied. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? can be reasonably assumed to be random, Ho : V V versus Hy : V V Is given to be random (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) cannot be reasonably assumed to be random, Find the test statistic, Zo. is given to not be random, zo = (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value. P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? A. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is 38%. O B. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 38%. O C. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 38%. O D. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is not 38%