PLEASE NO AI WILL BE CHECKING THROUGH DETECTOR PLEASE AND THANK YOU WILL GVE GOOD REVIEW

Mark, an avid amateur'car-guy', enjoyed fixing his car. He noticed the brakes on his car were worn, and decided to replace them. He went to the local Apex Auto store and purchased a very complex set of brakes. The salesman asked whether the brakes would be installed by a certified mechanic; Mark said he planned to install them himself, even though he was not a certified mechanic. The salesman thought this odd, given the complexity of the brake system. Indeed, the salesman knew of many certified mechanics who refused to install these brakes owing to their complexity, and suspectedan untrained person like Mark would not be able to install them properly. But the salesman said nothing to Mark, selling him the brakes without warning. Mark did not properly install the brakes, and when he was drivingthey failed, causing injury to Mrs. Walker.

Drawing on any of our 5 cases from Weeks 23 and 24 (i.e., Donoghue v. Stevenson, Palsgraff, Wagon Mound (#1), Cooper v Hobarts, and Deloitte v Livent), what are the chances that Mrs. Walker could establish that Apex Auto owed her a prima facie duty of care?