please now

1. 2. 3. Plain Tet Det No so 1. Assume that your data analytics examination related to voids and voided sales at a large retail location for the period of December 1" through 30 resulted in the following summary table. Also assume that location square footages available for retail sales are reasonably comparable across these locations: Scenario A Scenario B Number of Voids Number of Voids Employee Dollars Voided Location Dollars Voided New York, NY A 230 S8.050 360 $12,600 B B Chicago, IL 360 S10,800 230 $6.900 Washington, DC 1 S5,625 260 225 $6,500 600 $19,200 260 Miami, FL D $8.320 190 $5,320 185 S5.180 E Boston, MA Cleveland, OH 225 $7,425 F 600 $19,800 185 $4.995 190 Portland, OR $5,130 H 2050 $62,290 2050 $63,555 I Case Discussion: 1. Given this fact pattern, identity which location in each scenario is anomalous, if and describe your rationale? 2. Assuming that these transactions are of reasonable significance to the retail organization, would you recommend a deeper examination of the anomaly for A, B, or both? Why? 3. Assuming that these transactions are of reasonable significance to the retail organization, which anomaly would concern you more, the anomaly in scenari one in scenario B, if you identified such an anomaly? Why? 1. 2. 3. Plain Tet Det No so 1. Assume that your data analytics examination related to voids and voided sales at a large retail location for the period of December 1" through 30 resulted in the following summary table. Also assume that location square footages available for retail sales are reasonably comparable across these locations: Scenario A Scenario B Number of Voids Number of Voids Employee Dollars Voided Location Dollars Voided New York, NY A 230 S8.050 360 $12,600 B B Chicago, IL 360 S10,800 230 $6.900 Washington, DC 1 S5,625 260 225 $6,500 600 $19,200 260 Miami, FL D $8.320 190 $5,320 185 S5.180 E Boston, MA Cleveland, OH 225 $7,425 F 600 $19,800 185 $4.995 190 Portland, OR $5,130 H 2050 $62,290 2050 $63,555 I Case Discussion: 1. Given this fact pattern, identity which location in each scenario is anomalous, if and describe your rationale? 2. Assuming that these transactions are of reasonable significance to the retail organization, would you recommend a deeper examination of the anomaly for A, B, or both? Why? 3. Assuming that these transactions are of reasonable significance to the retail organization, which anomaly would concern you more, the anomaly in scenari one in scenario B, if you identified such an anomaly? Why