please only answer based on case study age discrimination question!!

W * APPLICATIONS Age Discrimination in a Promotion? Best Protection Insurance Company (BPIC) handles a massive volume of claims elch year in the corporate claims function, as well as in its for real cims center. The corporate claims function is headed by the senior vice president of corporate claims (SVPCCX.reporting to the SVPCC are two maingers of corporate claims (MCC Life and MCC Residential and a bighly skilled corpoeme claim specialist (CCS). Each regional otice shended by a regional center manager (RCM), the RCM is responsible for both supervision and claims specialists within the regional office. The RCMs report to the vice president of regional clits (VPRC). The organization is structured as follows: SVPCC VPRC MCCL MCCR CCS RCM RCM RCM RCM BPI decided to reorganise its claims function by eliminating the four reinottices and the RCM position and establishing is small field offices throughout the country. The other part of the recognization involved creating live new CC positions The CCS job itself was to be rodesigned and upgraded in terms of knowledge and skill requirements. These new CC positions would be stated through internal promotions from within the claim function The SVPCC asked Gita a 52 year old RCM, to apply for one of the new CC positions since his job wat belang eliminated. The other RCM, all of whom were over 10 Na DC rendam BPI decided to reorganize its claims function by eliminating the four regional offices and the RCM position) and establishing numerous small field ottion throughout the country. The other part of the reorganization involved creating five new CCS positions. The CCS job itself was to be redesigned to upgraded in terms of knowledge and skill requirements. These new CCS positions would be staffed lough internal promotions from within the claim function. The SVPCC asked Gus Tavas, a 52-year-old RCMto apply for one of the new CC positions since his job was being eliminated The other RCMS all who were over years of age, were also asked to apply. Neither Gus or the other RCM were promoted to the CC positions. Other candidates some of whom were also over 40 went the bypassed. The promotions went to live claims specialists and supervisors from within the former regional offices, all of whom were under age 40. Two of use y promoted employees and worked for, and reported to us as ROM Upon learning of his failure to be promoud, Gus sought to find out why What he learned led him to believe that he had been discriminated against because of this page ago. He then retained legal counsel torney Brace Davis. Bruce met informally with the SVPCC to try to determine what had happened in the promotion process and why his client had not been promoted. He was told that there were mes condidates who were better qualified to the lackadequate clicand communication skills for the new job of CCS The SVPC refused to reconde Gus for the job and said that will decisions were che in us and we thened in federal district court, claiming a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. They also stupored mumero PCdoumens, including the period tiles of all applicants for the CC positions After reviewing the documents and discussing things with related reboot dhe promotion processually wed by BPC The SVICC MCC conducted the entire process they received no input from the VPRO the HR department. There was no formal, with job description for the news portion there formalitemal job posting as required by company policy. The SVPC and the MCC developed a lot of employees they thought might be interested in the joh including us, and then met to consider the list of candidates. At that meeting the personnelles previous performances of the candidates were not comed After deciding on the five candidates who would be offered the promotion (all live accepted the SVPCC MCC cand the persona filer odprl these five (only) to check for any discontiming information. None was found. Bake inspection of the files revealed no written comments in peperonce appraisals for any of the candidates including Gus. Also, there was to indication that Gus Iacked technical and communication skills. All of Gus's previous appearings were above average, and there was no evidence of decline in the favorability of the rings. Finally, an interview with the VPRC(sou) revealed to be lind not hon consulted at all during the promotion process that he was shocked load belief thousand not been promoted, and that there was no question. Not that was politie in all respects for the CCS job. in that Gus bad been intentionally discriminated at the basis of his address Please respond to the following: Based on the case study Age Discrimination in a Promotion (pp. 87-88), identify three considerations that the Best Protection Insurance Company (BPIC) could include in the promotional process that it utilized to avoid future legal issues. Provide support for your rationale Reply