Please provide feedback and examples on how to improve this research paper/literature review:

_(Rubric:

_{1. Introduction: Define the key terms (e.g., masculinity, minority populations, violence against women) and explain the importance of this issue.}

_{2. Literature Review: Summarize and synthesize key findings from the selected articles, addressing themes and gaps.}

_{3. Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths, limitations, and implications of the research.}

_{4. Reflection and Discussion: Discuss the intersectionality of race, culture, gender, and systemic factors, offering your perspective or critique.}

_{5. Conclusion: Summarize the main insights and suggest avenues for future research or intervention.)}

Violence against women (VAW) is a global issue, and minority groups in the US face unique challenges due to the intersections of gender norms, race, and ethnicity that are culturally specific. This research review explores the ways that masculinity and gender beliefs affect VAW in Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latino communities. It looks into gender norms, how they affect how women are treated, and how it makes them more vulnerable to violence. Analyzing research on masculinity in minority groups and its connection to violence against women are the primary focuses of this review of the literature. This review aims to understand how particular cultural beliefs and community dynamics impact VAW by examining the cultural and economic aspects of minority communities. The review intends to understand VAW better and provide recommendations for culturally sensitive interventions.

Masculinity often encompasses a range of behaviors, roles, and behaviors culturally associated with being male. In minority populations, traditional notions of masculinity may emphasize authority, strength, and control, which can intersect with cultural practices and expectations. Violence against women includes any act of gender-based violence that results in physical, sexual, or psychological harm to women. It includes domestic violence, sexual assault, emotional abuse, coercion, and controlling behaviors. In this context, minority populations refer to ethnic groups such as Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, and Asian communities within predominantly non-Hispanic white societies. Each group exhibits unique cultural frameworks that shape experiences and expressions of masculinity. Cultural interpretations of masculinity can significantly differ. For example, machismo in Latino cultures, as opposed to the idea of strong stoicism prevalent in some Asian communities, highlights these differences and requires a complex understanding.

According to key research, violence against women is associated with traditional masculinity. Research on Hispanic/Latino groups frequently addresses "machismo," implying a link between high rates of domestic violence and traditional gender norms. The focus of research on Black and African American communities is on the systemic and historical factors that shape male identities, frequently amid social and economic hardship, and maybe a factor in marital disputes. Principles of honor and face may indirectly support violence in Asian societies by underreporting and prioritizing family reputation over personal well-being. Cultural beliefs greatly influence views of masculinity and violence. The opposing ideas of male dominance and protective masculinity are reflected in the two concepts of "machismo" and "caballerismo" in Hispanic cultures. Gender relations may be impacted by the historical emasculation associated with systemic racism in African American communities, which may encourage hyper-masculine behaviors as a form of resistance. In Asian societies, indirect control over women may take the form of psychological abuse, and masculinity may be expressed in reserved ways.

Attitudes toward violence against women are greatly influenced by traditional gender standards, which frequently enforce specific responsibilities and behaviors. Following cultural norms may normalize certain actions, affecting how VAW incidents are reported and how seriously they are viewed. Developing successful preventative and intervention programs that reach minority groups and tackle the underlying causes of VAW requires an understanding of these cultural influences. VAW in minority populations can often be made worse by traditional ideas of masculinity, which emphasize control and domination. Studies indicate patriarchal norms reinforce gender-based violence, and strict gender roles have been linked to an increased prevalence of VAW. However, other research draws attention to complexities, highlighting notable differences across minority groups according to social, cultural, and economic aspects. According to specific research, community-based interventions that redefine masculinity may be effective in lowering the prevalence of VAW.

Cultural norms and traditional gender roles significantly shape attitudes toward VAW. The emphasis on male authority and female submissiveness in many minority societies may affect how VAW is viewed and reported. According to studies, because victims may be afraid of stigma or family disgrace, these cultural standards may cause underreporting of VAW. VAW and cultural expectations are connected; literature describes instances in which women's responsibilities as primary caregivers are reinforced, thereby restricting their sense of independence. Economic difficulties have significantly anticipated the occurrence of VAW. An increase in VAW incidents is frequently the result of increasing stress and conflict in relationships, which are commonly correlated with financial instability. According to research, financial strains can cause the health of relationships to decline and lead to aggressive conduct as a coping strategy. Economic disadvantages are more common in minority groups, where this is most noticeable. According to research, addressing socioeconomic differences may help reduce some factors contributing to VAW. Issues related to immigration status have a significant role in the dynamics of VAW in minority groups. Immigrants may encounter limited access to resources, lack of legal status, and language limitations, which might increase their vulnerability to VAW. These elements make it more difficult to perpetrate VAW and be a victim of it. According to studies, undocumented women are more at risk because they may be reluctant to seek assistance out of fear of deportation or other legal consequences.

There are different levels of association between violence and masculinity among various minority groups, according to both quantitative and qualitative research. Statistics frequently indicate a strong link between machismo attitudes and domestic violence incidents within the Hispanic/Latino community. Qualitative information about how cultural narratives support these behaviors can be found in ethnographic studies. The impact of socioeconomic conditions on violence and masculinity is a common topic of research in Black communities. Mixed-methods studies have examined how cultural resilience can occasionally lessen these effects. However, there are still gaps in comprehensive data that properly account for the variety of experiences within the community. Research frequently emphasizes how immigration stress and acculturation affect gender roles and family dynamics in Asian populations. A growing corpus of qualitative studies examines how views of masculinity change across generations and how these changes are connected to violence against women and in the home.

There are still some substantial gaps in our understanding of the role of masculinity in VAW across minority populations despite tremendous advances in this area. One shortcoming is the absence of thorough research that takes intersectionality and various regional cultural settings into account among various minority populations. In terms of methodology, a lot of research uses self-reported data, which might be biased or underreported, especially in societies where talking about violence is frowned upon. Furthermore, few long-term investigations track changes over time, which is essential for comprehending how VAWs are affected by changes in cultural norms. To monitor changes and the effectiveness of interventions over time, future research should concentrate on follow-up studies and use a broader range of methodological approaches, such as mixed methods research. These studies' conclusions have important impacts on community initiatives and legislative changes. Culturally sensitive education that questions damaging masculine norms and advances gender equality must be a part of VAW prevention programs. In addition to VAW, policies should concentrate on multilayer treatments that address structural problems, including discrimination and poverty. Gender norms can be redefined with the aid of community-based programs that involve men and boys in conversations about responsible manhood and healthy relationships. The effectiveness of these treatments can also be increased by offering minority communities tools and support networks that are easily accessible and culturally sensitive.

This review of the literature emphasizes the critical connection between VAW in minority populations and deeply ingrained masculine norms, pointing to larger systemic factors, including racial and socioeconomic inequalities. Addressing the underlying causes of violence against women in these populations requires an understanding of this relationship. By highlighting the weaknesses in current research approaches and the importance of an intersectional approach to VAW in minority communities, this review adds to the continuing conversation. An analysis of necessary research shows the significance of culturally sensitive frameworks in creating successful interventions. The goal of future studies should be to examine how VAW and masculinity interact from the perspectives of other intersecting identities, like LGBTQ+ minorities. Examining how media and technology influence contemporary ideas of masculinity may also provide helpful information. Our understanding will be improved, and more effective violence prevention methods will be informed by expanding research to include various minority populations and long-term studies.

According to the literature assessment, traditional ideas of masculinity are complex and multidimensional in minority groups like Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latino societies. Cultural backgrounds have a significant impact on how men understand and exhibit masculinity. These societal expectations frequently define masculinity in terms of power, dominance, and strength, all of which can be connected to incidents of violence against women. Higher VAW rates in these areas can result from stressors that may promote destructive masculine behaviors, which are exacerbated by economic pressures and societal inequality. Within these minority groups, intersectional identities show how socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity interact to create masculine identities in a distinctive way that influences violence against women. Peer and community approval play a big part in either supporting or opposing aggressive male behaviors, and community interventions have the power to rethink what it means to be a positive man.

By emphasizing the need to comprehend masculinity within the unique cultural and socioeconomic circumstances of minority populations, this review advances the field. It emphasizes how crucial it is to implement culturally sensitive interventions and policies that deal with the underlying causes of VAW. It also advocates for a more balanced conversation in academic and applied contexts by highlighting the intersecting identities and systemic forces that influence masculinity experiences and expressions. Additional research can aid in the creation of more inclusive and successful tactics that seek to lessen VAW and advance gender equity by expanding our knowledge of the ways that violence against women and masculinity interact in minority communities.

Works Cited:

1. _{Soller, B., & Kuhlemeier, A. (2019). Gender and Intimate Partner Violence in Latino Immigrant Neighborhoods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9370-9}
2. _{Peralta, R. L., & Tuttle, L. A. (2013). Male Perpetrators of Heterosexual-Partner-Violence: The Role of Threats to Masculinity. Journal of Men's Studies, 21(3), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.2103.255}
3. _{Walters, A. S., & Valenzuela, I. (2019). "To me what's important is to give respect. There is no respect in cheating": Masculinity and Monogamy in Latino Men. Sexuality & Culture, 23(4), 1025-1053. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1007/s12119-019-09615-5}
4. _{Pompper, D. (2010). Masculinities, the Metrosexual, and Media Images: Across Dimensions of Age and Ethnicity. Sex Roles, 63(9-10), 682-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9870-7}
5. _{Griffith, D. M., Gunter, K., & Watkins, D. C. (2012). Measuring Masculinity in Research on Men of Color: Findings and Future Directions. American Journal of Public Health, 102(S2), S187-S194. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300715}
6. _{Saez, P. A., Casado, A., & Wade, J. C. (2009). Factors influencing masculinity ideology among latino men. Journal of Men's Studies, 17(2), 116-128. doi:https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1702.116}
7. _{Gerdes, Z. T., Alto, K. M., Jadaszewski, S., D'Auria, F., & Levant, R. F. (2018). A content analysis of research on masculinity ideologies using all forms of the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI). Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(4), 584-599. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1037/men0000134}
8. _{Dungee-Anderson, D., & Cox, L. A. (2000). Conflicting Gender Role Perceptions Among Middle Class African American Males and Females. Race, Gender & Class, 7(4), 99. https://ezproxy.shsu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/conflicting-gender-role-perceptions-among-middle/docview/218870106/se-2}
9. _{Griffith, D. M., & Cornish, E. K. (2018). "What defines a man?": Perspectives of African American men on the components and consequences of manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(1), 78-88. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1037/men0000083}
10. _{Singh, S., & David, S. L. G. (2024). "Boys'' role in life is to protect and defend": Primary school boys' constructions of masculinity within a context of violence." Perspectives in Education, 42(1), 84-97. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.38140/pie.v42i1.7187}
11. _{O'Dea, C. J., Jardin, E., & Saucier, D. A. (2022). The masculinity-based model of Aggressive Retaliation in Society (MARS). Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 23(2), 160-172. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1037/men0000391}
12. _{Martin, D. L. (2021). Violence and Masculinity in Small-Scale Societies. Current Anthropology, 62(S23), S169-S181. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1086/711689}
13. _{Qin, K., & Li, G. (2020). Understanding Immigrant Youths' Negotiation of Racialized Masculinities in One U.S. High School: An Intersectionality Lens on Race, Gender, and Language. Sexuality & Culture, 24(4), 1046-1063. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1007/s12119-020-09751-3}
14. _{Vokey, M., Tefft, B., & Tysiaczny, C. (2013). An Analysis of Hyper-Masculinity in Magazine Advertisements. Sex Roles, 68(9-10), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0268-1}
15. _{Falicov, C. J., P.H.D. (2010). Changing Constructions of Machismo for Latino Men in Therapy: "The Devil Never Sleeps". Family Process, 49(3), 309-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01325.x}
16. _{Roy, K. M., & Allen, S. H. (2022). Men, families, and the reconceptualization of masculinities. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 14(1), 28-43. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1111/jftr.12441}
17. _{Gonzalez-guarda, R., Cummings, A. M., Becerra, M., Fernandez, M. C., & Mesa, I. (2013). Needs and Preferences for the Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence Among Hispanics: A Community's Perspective. Journal of Primary Prevention, 34(4), 221-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-013-0312-5}
18. _{Corprew Iii, C. S., Matthews, J. S., & Mitchell, A. D. (2014). Men at the Crossroads: A Profile Analysis of Hypermasculinity in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Men's Studies, 22(2), 105-121. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.3149/jms.2202.105}
19. _{DeGue, S., Singleton, R., & Kearns, M. (2024). A qualitative analysis of beliefs about masculinity and gender socialization among US mothers and fathers of school-age boys. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 25(2), 152-164. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.1037/men0000450}
20. _{Dogan Gangal, A., Yigit, Y., & Ali, Y. (2024). Generational Differences in Attitudes towards Gender Roles and Violence Against Women. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 17(1), 198-208.}