Please read below case and answer the following questions:

"Audrey Vokes was a 51-year-old widow who wanted to become an accomplished dancer. She was invited to attend a

dance party at J. P. Davenports' School of Dancing, an Arthur Murray franchise. She subsequently signed up for dance

classes, at which she received elaborate praise. Her instructor initially sold her eight half-hour dance lessons for $14.50

each, to be used one each month. Eventually, after being continually told that she had excellent potential and that she was

developing into a beautiful dancerwhen in fact she was not developing her dance ability and had no aptitude for dance

she ended up purchasing a total of 2,302 hours' worth of dance lessons for a total of $31,090.45. When it finally became

clear to Vokes that she was not developing her dance skills, in part because she had trouble even hearing the musical beat,

she sued Arthur Murray. What would be the basis of her argument? Her case was initially dismissed by the trial court. What

do you think the result of her appeal was? [ Vokes v. Arthur Murray, 212 So. 2d 906 (1968).]"

• Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
• Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
• Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties).Provide a judgment on who should win the case - be clear.
• Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.