Please read the case study entitled Hot Coffee that you find in the reading assignment. Based on what you have learned in this unit, answer the following questions: 1. What does caveat emptor mean? According to this doctrine, who is responsible for Stella Liebecks burns? Explain. 2. Does the fact that shes seventy-nine years old make it more difficult to justify a caveat emptor attitude in this case? 3. One aspect of the caveat emptor doctrine is that it maximizes respect for the consumer as an independent and autonomous decider. Could that be a reason for affirming that a seventy-nine-year-old is a better candidate than most for a caveat emptor ethics of consumption? 4. In general terms, what does it mean to claim that an implicit contract arises around a transaction? How does that contract protect the consumer? https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/business-ethics/s16-05-case-studies.html