please read theTA Operating Corp. v. Solar Applications Engineering, Inc.case, which starts on page 490. Then, answer the questions following the case, which read: "1. Why did Solar believe it was entitled to the contract balance here? 2. Why did the court determine that Solar should not have been awarded the contract damages that it claimed, even though it substantially complied? 3. How has the common law changed in regard to demanding strict compliance with a contract? Finally, describe a situation in which you believe that substantial compliance should be enough to fulfill contractual obligations.