Please read this article to answer the questions https://online.pcc.edu/content/enforced/412597-10451.202201.BA226/instructor_notes/TheCaseOfTheSpelunceanExplorers.pdf

There are various schools of jurisprudenceal thought, as well as types of legal reasoning (see info at bottom). In this discussion assignment we are going to explore how different legal philosophies could affect judicial decisions. Please read or skim through the "facts" of a hypothetical court case entitled The Case of the Speluncean Explorers (pdf) You must start a thread before you will be able to see what others have posted. In your first post answer the following questions: How would you have ruled on the case if you had been one of the judges, and why? Which school(s) of jurisprudenceal thought apply to your ruling? I'm providing a few comments to help guide students in discussing this topic and others going forward. It's important that students make at least one substantive post early on as that's the only way a discussion can really take place. Reply in your subsequent posts to others in the class. At least two substantive posts are required. The goal is to have a meaningful discussion about the topic. At least two substantive posts are required