Please review the case titled Hecht v. Andover Assoc. Mgmt. Co. Who are the parties in the
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Please review the case titled Hecht v. Andover Assoc. Mgmt. Co.
Who are the parties in the case?
What is the procedural history of the case?
(i.e., how did the case get to the New York Supreme Court?)
What facts may prove, upon remand to the trial court, that Andover Management was grossly negligent?
Transcribed Image Text:
Hecht v. Andover Assoc. Mgmt. Co. 910 N.Y.S.2d 405 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010) Charles Hecht invested his money in Andover Associates LLC I, an investment company that sought funds from wealthy investors and invested the funds in a variety of investment products. Hecht was a passive investor in Andover Associates. The LLC's manag- ing member was Andover Associates Management Company. Andover Management retained Ivy Asset Management Corporation as its investment consultant. Ivy recommended that Andover Management utilize Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities as its investment manager. Madoff's overall fees were much lower than what investment managers typically charged, and Andover Management initially invested 100 percent of Andover Associates's funds with Madoff. For a number of years, Madoff's firm paid generous returns to Andover Associates. However, in December 2008, it became known that Madoff had been running a Ponzi scheme, whereby no profits were actually being earned, but instead earlier investors were paid returns from the capital invested by newer investors. At the time Madoff's fraud was discovered, 25 percent of Andover Associates's assets were invested with Madoff. On behalf of Andover Associates LLC I, Hecht brought a legal action against Andover Management and Ivy on several grounds in a New York supreme court, a trial court in that state. Hecht claimed that Ivy breached the LLC's administrative ser- vices agreement by failing to reconcile Madoff's monthly statements. Hecht alleged that had Ivy attempted to reconcile Madoff's monthly statements against the trade tickets, Ivy would have discovered that there were no trade tickets because no trades were ever executed. Thus, Hecht alleged that, but for Ivy's failure to reconcile the statements, Madoff's fraud would have been dis- covered earlier and Andover Associates would have been able to withdraw its investment. Hecht claimed that, as a result of Ivy's breach of the administrative services agreement, Andover Associates sustained damages in the amount of $14 million, the value of its Madoff investment. Hecht also alleged that Ivy was negligent in recommending Madoff's firm without conducting a sufficient "due diligence" investigation of his operation. Hecht asserted Andover Associates's claim against Andover Management for gross negligence in investing with Madoff with- out conducting its own due diligence investigation. In particular, Hecht alleged that Madoff's confirmation slips and statements reported purchases and sales of securities at prices outside the range at which the securities traded on the days in question. Hecht alleged that had Andover Management conducted a proper investigation it would have learned that Madoff's confirma- tion slips and statements were false because no trades were actually being conducted. Hecht alleged that but for Andover Man- agement's negligence in failing to react to the suspicious confirmation slips and other red flags, Andover Associates would have learned of Madoff's fraud and been able to liquidate its investment. Andover Management asked the trial court to dismiss Hecht's complaint by citing the business judgment rule, a rule that protects from liability managers who make good-faith business decisions. Hecht v. Andover Assoc. Mgmt. Co. 910 N.Y.S.2d 405 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010) Charles Hecht invested his money in Andover Associates LLC I, an investment company that sought funds from wealthy investors and invested the funds in a variety of investment products. Hecht was a passive investor in Andover Associates. The LLC's manag- ing member was Andover Associates Management Company. Andover Management retained Ivy Asset Management Corporation as its investment consultant. Ivy recommended that Andover Management utilize Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities as its investment manager. Madoff's overall fees were much lower than what investment managers typically charged, and Andover Management initially invested 100 percent of Andover Associates's funds with Madoff. For a number of years, Madoff's firm paid generous returns to Andover Associates. However, in December 2008, it became known that Madoff had been running a Ponzi scheme, whereby no profits were actually being earned, but instead earlier investors were paid returns from the capital invested by newer investors. At the time Madoff's fraud was discovered, 25 percent of Andover Associates's assets were invested with Madoff. On behalf of Andover Associates LLC I, Hecht brought a legal action against Andover Management and Ivy on several grounds in a New York supreme court, a trial court in that state. Hecht claimed that Ivy breached the LLC's administrative ser- vices agreement by failing to reconcile Madoff's monthly statements. Hecht alleged that had Ivy attempted to reconcile Madoff's monthly statements against the trade tickets, Ivy would have discovered that there were no trade tickets because no trades were ever executed. Thus, Hecht alleged that, but for Ivy's failure to reconcile the statements, Madoff's fraud would have been dis- covered earlier and Andover Associates would have been able to withdraw its investment. Hecht claimed that, as a result of Ivy's breach of the administrative services agreement, Andover Associates sustained damages in the amount of $14 million, the value of its Madoff investment. Hecht also alleged that Ivy was negligent in recommending Madoff's firm without conducting a sufficient "due diligence" investigation of his operation. Hecht asserted Andover Associates's claim against Andover Management for gross negligence in investing with Madoff with- out conducting its own due diligence investigation. In particular, Hecht alleged that Madoff's confirmation slips and statements reported purchases and sales of securities at prices outside the range at which the securities traded on the days in question. Hecht alleged that had Andover Management conducted a proper investigation it would have learned that Madoff's confirma- tion slips and statements were false because no trades were actually being conducted. Hecht alleged that but for Andover Man- agement's negligence in failing to react to the suspicious confirmation slips and other red flags, Andover Associates would have learned of Madoff's fraud and been able to liquidate its investment. Andover Management asked the trial court to dismiss Hecht's complaint by citing the business judgment rule, a rule that protects from liability managers who make good-faith business decisions.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Parties in the Case Charles Hecht Investor who placed money in Andover Associates LLC I Andover Asso... View the full answer
Related Book For
Income Tax Fundamentals 2013
ISBN: 9781285586618
31st Edition
Authors: Gerald E. Whittenburg, Martha Altus Buller, Steven L Gill
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Assume that you have just been hired as a financial analyst by Tropical Sweets Inc., a mid-sized California company that specializes in creating exotic candies from tropical fruits such as mangoes,...
-
On December 31, the end of the first year of operations, Frankenreiter Inc. manufactured 25,600 units and sold 24,000 units. The following income statement was prepared, based on the variable costing...
-
Consider the free-sliding beam shown in Fig. P8.4a. Direct and cross FRFs were measured at six locations and the imaginary parts are provided for the frequency interval near its second bending...
-
Poke a hole in a piece of cardboard and hold the cardboard horizontally in the sunlight (as in Figure 1.6). Note the image of the Sun that is cast below. To convince yourself that the round spot of...
-
How the policy will be implemented? Comment on any implementation issues related to the professional development policy (consider budget allocations/funding, time available, privacy/confidentiality,...
-
Writec#or C++ code for the Radix sort using queue to sort 2 digits numbers and sort these numbers using Radix sort and merge sort and compare both algorithms using 30000, 60000, and 90000 items
-
People immersed in strong unchanging magnetic fields occasionally report sensing a metallic taste. Some investigators suspect that motion in the constant field could produce a changing flux and a...
-
All ferromagnetic materials have a Curie temperature, a temperature above which they will cease to be magnetic. Explain in some detail why you might expect this to be so.
-
At what point in the process of muscle contraction is ATP required?
-
What are the functions of bone marrow?
-
A particular species of copepod, a small marine crustacean, emits a flash of light consisting of \(1.4 \times 10^{10}\) photons at a wavelength of \(490 \mathrm{~nm}\). The flash lasts for \(2.4...
-
A star connected 6-pole, 50Hz squirrel cage induction motor can be modeled using the approximate per-phase equivalent circuit with the following parameters: The motor is rated at 26 kW. At its rated...
-
Cleaning Service Company's Trial Balance on December 31, 2020 is as follows: Account name Debit Credit Cash 700 Supplies Pre-paid insurance Pre-paid office rent Equipment Accumulated depreciation -...
-
Describe the process of valuing the entrepreneurs ownership interest in a two-stage investment. Refer to Tables 13.10 and 13.13. Data from table 13.10 Data from table 13.13 Market potential...
-
Euro Exchange Rates. The exchange rate that we consider is the amount of euros that one can purchase for one U.S. dollar. We have \(T=699\) daily observations from the period April 1, 2005, through...
-
Evaluate the current yield curve level and structure using the following screens: a. YCRV or GC to access yield curves. b. FWCV to determine implied forward rates. c. USoo03M, USoo06M, USoo09M, and...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App