Question: please show your work, thanks. 1.17 Consider the voice compression system of problem 1.14. For a market window of two years, and expected profit margin

please show your work, thanks.
1.17 Consider the voice compression system of problem 1.14. For a market window of two years, and expected profit margin of 27% in the marketing of 50,000 units implemented with alternative A, determine the following: a. Determine the expected company revenues in dollars. b. What would the percent loss of revenue be if the time-to-market were extended, causing a deployment delay of 6 months? How much is the loss in dollars? c. Plot the cumulative loss of revenues of this product for delays in its time- to-market in a per-week basis. 1.14 A voice compression system for an audio application is being designed as an embedded system application. Three methods of implementation are under consideration: Under method A, the design would use a Digital Signal Proces- sor (DSP); in method B, the design would be completed with an embedded microcontroller; while in method C, the design will be completed with an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) where all functions will reside in hardware. Alternative A has NRE, of $250,000 and a recurrent cost per unit RP, of $75. Alternative B has NRE) = $150,000 and RP) = $130; while the ASIC solution has NRE = $2,000,000 and RPc = $20. 1.17 Consider the voice compression system of problem 1.14. For a market window of two years, and expected profit margin of 27% in the marketing of 50,000 units implemented with alternative A, determine the following: a. Determine the expected company revenues in dollars. b. What would the percent loss of revenue be if the time-to-market were extended, causing a deployment delay of 6 months? How much is the loss in dollars? c. Plot the cumulative loss of revenues of this product for delays in its time- to-market in a per-week basis. 1.14 A voice compression system for an audio application is being designed as an embedded system application. Three methods of implementation are under consideration: Under method A, the design would use a Digital Signal Proces- sor (DSP); in method B, the design would be completed with an embedded microcontroller; while in method C, the design will be completed with an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) where all functions will reside in hardware. Alternative A has NRE, of $250,000 and a recurrent cost per unit RP, of $75. Alternative B has NRE) = $150,000 and RP) = $130; while the ASIC solution has NRE = $2,000,000 and RPc = $20
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
