please use the irac method to answer thanks!!

Harry signed a lease with Hawthorne Apartments in Portland. The lease required Harry to reimburse Hawthorne Apartments for any damage to the apartment not caused by the landlord's negligence or fault. After moving in, Harry received a new washer and dryer from his parents. He did not read the instruction manual before overloading the dryer with bedding, including an unwashed pillow, which started a fire. Harry refused to reimburse Hawthorne Apartments for the fire damages. Hawthorne Apartments filed a suit in Oregon state circuit court against Harry, alleging that he breached the lease by failing to pay for the damages caused by the fire. Harry argued that the lease was unenforceable for lack of consideration. Is Harry correct? Instruction: please use the IRAC method when answering the question. IRAC stands for "Issue, Rule, Application and Conclusion". In other words, first you should summarize the relevant facts, and state the legal issue/question of this case, then talk about what the relevant legal rule and principle is for this case; lastly, you should apply the legal rule/principle to the facts of this case to reach a legal conclusion. The answer does not necessarily have to be long, but it should include all four elements of IRAC. Best of luck