pls answer each question in paragraph form! thx

Choices It superstars bring a bit of confict to the situotion, the result Can Disharmony Build a Better Team? Sports metaphors abound in the workplate. We talk about "heavy hitters" and ask teammates to "step up to the plate." But the real world of teamwork is dominated by the quest for cooperation, perhaps at the cost of needed friction. And that, according to Cambridge scholar Mark de Rond, is a potential performance probiem. "When teams work well," du Rond says, "it is because, not in spite, of individual differences" Those in favor of du Rond's views are likely to argue that even If superstars bring a bit of conflict to the situation, the result may well be added creativity and a performance boost. Instead of trying to make everyone happy, perhaps it's time for managers and team leaders to accept that disharmony can be functional. A bit of tension may be a price worth paying tor high performance. Those worried obout du Rond's views might say there's a fine line between a superstar's real performance contribution and collateral damage or negative impact caused by personality and temperament clashes. And that line is a hard one both to Leon Bennett/Getty Images Sport/Getty images' spot and to manage. "There is no ' l ' in team!" they say. But basketball superstar Michael Jordan once said: "There is an ' 1 ' in win." What's his point? Jordan is suggesting that someone as expert as him at a task shouldn't Given what we know about teams and your personal experialways be subordinated to the team. Rather, it's the team's job to ences with them, should we be finding ways to accommodate the support his talents so they shine their brightest. superstar on a team... or avoid them