pls I need a coreect answer by computer .....

Abdullah is the chief engineer of Marafiq Utility, a large utility company. Marafiq, a progressive company, had been conducting research for several years in a search for more effective ways to produce electricity. Most of the plants used oil to develop energy, and it was obvious that the other sources had to be explored. Abdullah had been with Marafiq for 30 years, and he was considered an excellent, innovative engineer who was very conservative in his relationships with peers, superiors, and subordinates. During the last three years he served on the companys research committee which monitored both the research efforts and the budget needed to support them.

Among the projects being studied were solar energy, methane gas derived from garbage and other vegetable waste and nuclear energy. The most promising possibility seemed to be nuclear fuel. Many other utilities were using it and they appeared to have few problems with its use. Records of other plants around the region were checked, and after considerable deliberation top management decided to go ahead and file for a permit with the public utility commission (PUC).

Abdullah was asked to assemble an engineering team to work on the project, and he turned to his brightest people, all of whom he believed would jump at the chance to work on the project. He was right about the first four he spoke to. When he asked Amjad Ali, a brilliant young engineer, he was met with a cold stare. If this company wants to go nuclear, Im not going to help it :Whats more, III testify against the permit at the PUC hearing.

THINK? Before answering the questions below or discussing the case with others, try and work through systematically the Case-study Analysis

CONTEXT?

Identify the context of the supervisor performing the function of controlling in this case-study.

1. What should Abdullah do about Amjad Ali?

2. If an employee is unhappy with his companys plans should he do more than quit?

3. To what extent is Amjad Ali being unreasonable?

4. What might his future be?

Abdullah is the chief engineer of Marafiq Utility, a large utility company. Marafiq, a progressive company, had been conducting research for several years in a search for more effective ways to produce electricity. Most of the plants used oil to develop energy, and it was obvious that the other sources had to be explored. Abdullah had been with Marafiq for 30 years, and he was considered an excellent, innovative engineer who was very conservative in his relationships with peers, superiors, and subordinates. During the last three years he served on the companys research committee which monitored both the research efforts and the budget needed to support them.

Among the projects being studied were solar energy, methane gas derived from garbage and other vegetable waste and nuclear energy. The most promising possibility seemed to be nuclear fuel. Many other utilities were using it and they appeared to have few problems with its use. Records of other plants around the region were checked, and after considerable deliberation top management decided to go ahead and file for a permit with the public utility commission (PUC).

Abdullah was asked to assemble an engineering team to work on the project, and he turned to his brightest people, all of whom he believed would jump at the chance to work on the project. He was right about the first four he spoke to. When he asked Amjad Ali, a brilliant young engineer, he was met with a cold stare. If this company wants to go nuclear, Im not going to help it :Whats more, III testify against the permit at the PUC hearing.

THINK? Before answering the questions below or discussing the case with others, try and work through systematically the Case-study Analysis

CONTEXT?

Identify the context of the supervisor performing the function of controlling in this case-study.

1. What should Abdullah do about Amjad Ali?

2. If an employee is unhappy with his companys plans should he do more than quit?

3. To what extent is Amjad Ali being unreasonable?

4. What might his future be?