Pose 3 recommendations and a reaction for the case below. Write this as if you were a marketing consultant or employee and we're giving this recommendation to your client or manager.

"In September 2020, a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel ruled that the specific tariffs imposed by the United States on Chinese products had actually violated Articles I and II of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). After disposing of two procedural objections made by the United States, the panel examined whether the tariffs were consistent with the GATT. The committee further concluded that the taxes were inconsistent with Article II:1(a) and (b), prohibiting the imposition of customs duties over the general Schedule rates and the Schedule rates agreed upon for specific products. The WTO panel had examined the Notices the United States had issued several listing products covered by the tariffs but found that neither the Notices themselves or the Section 301 Report supported a contribution finding. In the end, the panel further concluded that the United States failed to adequately explain the relationship between the List 2 tariffs and its public moral's objective. U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer criticized the panel ruling, stating, "this panel report confirms what the Trump Administration has been saying for four years: The WTO is completely inadequate to stop China's harmful technology practices". Even though there were criticisms about the WTO panel's decision, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin had praised the panel's decision. China always supports the panel's ruling and hopes that the United States can too."