Posts will be graded based on their completeness as well as their quality. The discussion is worth $20$ points total with the first post worth $10$ points and the second post also worth $10$ points. The ten points are earned according to quality and quantity. Quantity refers to the maximum of $5$ points for writing the required number of paragraphs, utilizing proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The remaining $5$ points are earned by providing a quality post that utilizes strong evidence and information to establish a position and be the foundation for their position. In other words, if you are talking about unemployment quoting your cousin is not considered a quality source, but citing the US$,$ Department of Labor is one.Given that perfor$$mance is a multiplicative function of both $$can$-$do$$ and $$will$-$do$$ factors, what would you think about this candidate?

What if they had little to no knowledge or skills necessary to do the job?

If they came in for an interview after this, what questions would you ask them?

What are your overall thoughts about this scenario?

Post $2$:

What if this person wanted to work at the Pentagon? How would this impact your screening methods then?