presentation critically assess the any article for Theoretical Approaches to International Organizations based on the rubric and present your critical analysis . use details from image and make presentation

i want to this question presentation

12 Mona Varbeid_13044 Only Introduction of the peperidebook chapter 315.000 Well thought out dudes all the important details about the source Author, date, place of publications journalbooks publisher 2.7 13.500) Good overall presentation, most important details are mentioned 2.4 12.00% Fairly quick presentation basic information shared 1.8 900 Mentions lytide and are opped the traductor all Detailed presentation of the partid/book chapter 525.00%) Detailed presente paper anidente 4.5 (22.50m) The purpose of articles identified Covers almost all main points, puments and the loc Conclusion is understood and presented in a dear way 4 (20.00%) Thesis purpose of source for the most part Fails to te the key points and arguments Conclusions understood but summary is deficient 3 (1500) The purpose of the located and understood Fails to explain the of the text Does not understand the conclusion and me property Significance of the paper article/book chapter and personal opinion/wvaluation 5125.000 Identification of purpose of the paper/book chapter of man argument or the appropriate Advance understanding of key points arguments and presents conclusion in a well-rounded Summary 4.5 (22.50%) Significance of lack of covered briefly Evaluates the material and expresset little personal opinion 4 (20.00) Significance is barely covered Meger attempt at ging personal evaluation of the best 3 (15.00) No understanding and for mention of the indicance or lack the Style and delivery Use of visual support 3115.00) Very clear logical progression Uses enthusiastic and en pontone and Vocabulary. Use of PPT or some form of our support in a relevant way 2.7 (13.50) Relatively local progression masing some connections anes Use of appropriate tone and vocabulary for the most part. Use of PT or some form of visual support in a relevant way 2.4 (12004 Presentation is a bit wobbly. Not always easy to follow. Monotone and non-enging Vocabulary is not very diverse, inefficiente por visual support 1.800 Presentation du linfocow Uncler language Tones the enconnor enthusiastic Vocabulary remain very basic No ute of opport Ability to answer questions 3 (15.00%) Understand questions. Can integrate knowledge to answer questions Thoroughly responds to questions 2.7 (13504) Understands questions. Mokes an effort to address the questions 2.4 12.00%) Presentation is a bit wobbly. Not always to follow. Monstone and non-engan Vocabulary not very diverse inefficient use of PP oral support, 16 Does not always understand the question Can address some question. On responds quickly to cuestions 1.8 19.00% Does not always understand the Question the makes no effort to respond to questions or does to poorly 12 Mona Varbeid_13044 Only Introduction of the peperidebook chapter 315.000 Well thought out dudes all the important details about the source Author, date, place of publications journalbooks publisher 2.7 13.500) Good overall presentation, most important details are mentioned 2.4 12.00% Fairly quick presentation basic information shared 1.8 900 Mentions lytide and are opped the traductor all Detailed presentation of the partid/book chapter 525.00%) Detailed presente paper anidente 4.5 (22.50m) The purpose of articles identified Covers almost all main points, puments and the loc Conclusion is understood and presented in a dear way 4 (20.00%) Thesis purpose of source for the most part Fails to te the key points and arguments Conclusions understood but summary is deficient 3 (1500) The purpose of the located and understood Fails to explain the of the text Does not understand the conclusion and me property Significance of the paper article/book chapter and personal opinion/wvaluation 5125.000 Identification of purpose of the paper/book chapter of man argument or the appropriate Advance understanding of key points arguments and presents conclusion in a well-rounded Summary 4.5 (22.50%) Significance of lack of covered briefly Evaluates the material and expresset little personal opinion 4 (20.00) Significance is barely covered Meger attempt at ging personal evaluation of the best 3 (15.00) No understanding and for mention of the indicance or lack the Style and delivery Use of visual support 3115.00) Very clear logical progression Uses enthusiastic and en pontone and Vocabulary. Use of PPT or some form of our support in a relevant way 2.7 (13.50) Relatively local progression masing some connections anes Use of appropriate tone and vocabulary for the most part. Use of PT or some form of visual support in a relevant way 2.4 (12004 Presentation is a bit wobbly. Not always easy to follow. Monotone and non-enging Vocabulary is not very diverse, inefficiente por visual support 1.800 Presentation du linfocow Uncler language Tones the enconnor enthusiastic Vocabulary remain very basic No ute of opport Ability to answer questions 3 (15.00%) Understand questions. Can integrate knowledge to answer questions Thoroughly responds to questions 2.7 (13504) Understands questions. Mokes an effort to address the questions 2.4 12.00%) Presentation is a bit wobbly. Not always to follow. Monstone and non-engan Vocabulary not very diverse inefficient use of PP oral support, 16 Does not always understand the question Can address some question. On responds quickly to cuestions 1.8 19.00% Does not always understand the Question the makes no effort to respond to questions or does to poorly