Prior to beginning this Discussion post, read and research Relevance / Prejudicial Rules of Evidence located in the Florida Statutes 90.401 - 90.403.

As we dive into Relevance as a main filter for evidence in a criminal trial, find three real criminal case examples of what seems like "relevant" evidence being ruled inadmissible under the Federal or Florida Rules of Evidence.

Summarize and cite each of the THREE examples and discuss why the court held the evidence, although relevant, to be inadmissible in trial.

Opinion portion - agree with or disagree with the following statement regarding the Relevancy test for evidence. Support your position thoroughly.

A judge deciding to rule relevant evidence as inadmissible because of the danger of unfair prejudice is a miscarriage of justice and does not adequately allow a jury to have all the facts.