Prioritizing Infrastructure Maintenance: The government could have prioritized the allocation of funds towards infrastructure maintenance. This would have ensured that there were sufficient funds for the repair and replacement of the bridge. This could have been achieved by conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis to understand the potential risks and costs associated with a bridge collapse versus the costs of repair and maintenance. Efficient Budget Management: The funds allocated for infrastructure development and maintenance should have been used judiciously. Misuse or misallocation of funds can lead to resource shortages for critical projects like bridge maintenance. Therefore, efficient budget management and oversight could have prevented this issue. Regular and Detailed Inspections: Despite the high costs, regular and detailed inspections of the bridge could have been prioritized in the budget. These inspections could have identified the design errors and worsening state of the bridge, allowing for timely intervention. Can you help me rewrite simpler