problem A) less than or Greater than are the choices.

Would we have been able to predict the 1999 n 1980 pe (denoted by 7)? The following bevariate data give the per capita mcome (in thouse 1980 and 1959 (source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Business, Nay 2000). The data are gression line is drawn. The equation for this line - 875+1.87 1950 per 1999 per capita capita Income, Y Income, J (In $1000s) (in $1000s) New Mexico 8.4 221 Missouri 9 4 26 2 Delaware 10 8 30. Iowa 9-7 2547 California 2018 Colorado 10.8 South Carolina (In=$10005) 1999 per capita Income, Arizona 2513 27 8 Mississippi 721 20.5 Vermont 8.7 25.9 Nevada 11.8 30.4 South Dakota 8.1 251 1980 per capita Income, X (In $ 1000s) North Carolina 8 2 2612 Florida 10.0 2810 inols Sand data to calculator sand data to END Based on the sample data and the regression line. be the tollenin ay Far these data, 1909 per capita incomes that sheigreater jean of the 1999 per capita incomes tend to be paired with 1980 per capita incomes that are Nchopchanel almean at the 1980 per capita incomes. X 5 (b) According to the regression fa in 1950 per capita income, there is a corresponding increase of new (c) what was the observed 1929 86 Fthe 1930 per capita Income was 9.4 thousand dollars? SEI When the 1980 per