Provide a brief description regarding the Malden Mills case. 2. What are the ethical principles applied in Malden Mills case? 3. Based on the new understating of Stakeholders concept, which Stakeholder group (s) got affected (from least to most) by Malden Mills case and how? 4. What was/were the legal obligations, if any, and how it was/were differentiated from ethical and moral ones? 5. While there are four responsibilities in the Carroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility, how does Malden Mills case prioritize each responsibility? 6. In your judgment, did each management satisfy the interest of their stockholders? How. 7. If you were in the decision maker back then, what could you have done