Provide a draft harassment policy base $on$ the article below

VCayr was a not$-$for$-$profit social service organization that connected members through its community activities. VCayr also assisted individuals with house hunting, job applications, opening bank accounts, applying for credit cards, and professional online and phone counselling. It also regularly hosted social events, where members and their families would get together, and held seminars with professionals. The organization was registered with the provincial government in a Canadian province and had a bylaw. According to its bylaw, all board of directors were elected biannually by VCayr$$s $500$ members, who paid a monthly membership fee. VCayr$$s structure was relatively flat $($see Exhibit $1).$ The board president acted as the face of VCayr and oversaw various roles, but had relatively the same degree of power as any other board director. In the first board meeting, the official roles $($i$.$e$.,$ president as well as secretary$,$ finance, operation, program, and communication directors$)$ were divided by elected candidates, based on consensus. Each director worked with teams of volunteers $($e$.$g$.,$ the social media team, logistics team, newsletter team$),$ that The following discussion outlines cases of sexual harassment and assault. These topics may be intellectually and emotionally difficult for some readers, especially those who have experienced an assault. In a safe setting, we intend to empathetically engage in this discussion, with an aim to better our understanding of how these agonizing situations can be prevented in organizations. If you are a survivor and this discussion has added to your anxiety, please seek support from available resources such as counselling services, including those at your institution. contributed to several projects $($e$.$g$.,$ workshop series, social events, cultural events$)$

Candy was a well$-$respected and long$-$time member of VCayr. Although Candy was active behind the scenes of different projects$$ logistics$,$ he was most known as the face of VCayr. Candy was a charismatic speaker and often represented VCayr at public events. Candy$$s reputation stretched beyond VCayr, as he was very active in other similar charitable organizations in the city. Videos of his workshops and lectures were available on the websites of other similar organizations in the city$$specifically$,$ on the website of a charity organization whose chief executive officer was a close friend of Candy$$s and who had consistently invited Candy as a speaker for charity events. Johnson had been working with Candy for four years. He knew him as a family man who cared about others and dedicated a lot of his personal time to helping members of his community. In addition to his positive public image, Candy had good relationships with the other board directors, including Johnson.

In $2018,$ Candy invited Wu to his work office to advise her on a VCayr project that she was working on$.$ He had made the invitation over a live, casual chat on their personal Google Hangouts, which Wu had on record. While discussing the project details in Candy$$s office, Candy made some sexual remarks about Wu$$s body and continued his remarks to the point where she felt very uncomfortable. Wu left the office feeling sexually harassed. Wu related how, in the months that followed, Candy continued to communicate with her over text or WhatsApp messages, sometimes inappropriately, with sexual jokes or sexually animated GIF images. Candy asked to meet with her again, but Wu stopped responding.