provide a response to the post below

Nice work! I think your write-up did a great job showing how Bulu and the other authors connect governance, ethics, and risk management. I really liked your point about the study finding gaps between corporate governance and areas like forensic accounting and bankruptcy. The bibliometric analysis makes it clear that accounting and ethics get a lot of attention in the literature, but bankruptcy and forensic auditing are still underexplored. That gap matters because both areas play such a direct role in predicting and preventing financial distress. Somehow while reading your report, I was thinking of financial ratios and indicators. I mean tools like Altman's Z-score or leverage measures are already used by managers and auditors to assess distress, and I can see how including them in future bibliometric studies could build on this article's foundation. It would make the connections between governance, ethics, and risk management even stronger and more practical. I also agree with you about the future potential. The authors mention AI as a way to combine big data with qualitative insights, and I think that could be a game changer. It would move us beyond just counting keywords and start capturing context, which makes the findings more practical. Overall, you pulled out these strengths really well, and I think you showed how this article gives a solid foundation for both researchers and practitioners.