Purpose

Software development is a team effort, which means that developers check each team member's work and give a constructive critique of it$.$ This lessens the chance for errors in code and also helps each team member develop code that is much more efficient and user$-$friendly. It also performs better in a system test.

Instructions

Complete the following steps:

This peer review will consist of $2$ parts. You must complete both parts to receive credit.

Access both of your M$03$ Programming Assignments in CodeGrade. You will have access to the peer review tab until the due date of this Peer Review assignment. CodeGrade has assigned you two students for each of your assignments to review. When reviewing your fellow students' programs address the following points using the feedback system in CodeGrade:

Design$/$Implementation: Are there noticeable issues$/$flaws in the design and implementation of the code? How would you remedy such issues?

Readability: Is the code well organized and easy to follow? Can you understand what is going on$,$ easily?

Documentation: Is the documentation well$-$written? does it explain what the code is accomplishing and how? Remember good documentation includes descriptive variable and function names in addition to clear$/$concise annotation.

Efficiency: Was the code efficient, without sacrificing readability and understanding?

Submit to this assignment, your thoughts on the review activity.

What did you find most useful from the review activity $($reviewing other students' programs and$/$or having your program reviewed$)?$

Did the process help you better understand the original programming assignment?

Would you modify your program based on the feedback$/$observations$?$