put this in a table format and save as csv$/"$Correlation$/$MOTS ID$",$"Recommendation ID$",$"App Name","Recommendation","Theme","Sub Theme","Level of Effort $($Small$,$ Medium, Large$)",$"Priority $($High$,$ Medium, Low$)",$"Ticket$($s$)$ linked to$",$"Validating SME Team","SME Assigned","EA Architect Assigned","App Contact","Org Name","VP Name","Status","Implementation Status","Reason for Rejecting","Accepted by$",$"Action Items for Accepted Rec","Tgt$.$ Date of Impl.","Actual Impl. Date","Comments","Follow$-$Up Actions"

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_1",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"End of service life for Redhat $($June $30,2024).$ Will need an evaluation $+$ post$-$mortem development","Technology","Modernization","Medium","High","$400006182",$"Red Team","Raghu Karumuru","Heien, Eric$/($eh$2897)",$"Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Accepted","Open","","","$2024-12-31","",$"Ready","",""

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_2",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Supported$/$stable version of Redhat","Technology","Modernization","Medium","High","$400006182",$"Red Team","Raghu Karumuru","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Accepted","Open","","","$2024-12-31","","",""$

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_3",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Develop detailed test plan including upgrade to incremental risk planning.","Technology","Testing Enhancements","Medium","High","$400006182",$"Red Team","Raghu Karumuru","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Rejected","We already follow the network operations risk assessment process for all changes in this environment.","","","$5/23-$ CIRT $-$ Yisacc

Check with the Red team as to how this rec applies to the outage

$7/26$ YD$-$ Per Casey $($Red team$)$

It seems to be geared towards testing enhancements and ensuring that a detailed testing plan is created pre$-$deployment.","",""

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_4",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Integrate into resiliency framework $($AIOneOps$)",$"Technology","Observability","Small","High","$400006182,400006114",$"Red Team","Raghu Karumuru","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Rejected$-$final","LDAP team needs more information as to what 'AIOneOps' is to determine if this is feasible. Unable to proceed without additional information, rejected for now.","","","$5/10-$ Pavani

Yisacc to engage Peter to see how AIOneOps can help

$5/17-$ Pete

Set up initial call with technical contacts to review Resiliency Framework and discuss potential onboarding pathway. Key contact OOO until $5/22","",""$

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_5",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Implement auto$-$close feature for unused connections","Technology","Observability","Small","High","$400006182",$"Red Team","Raghu Karumuru","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Accepted","Complete","","","$2023-11-01",$"Completed","",""

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_6",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Activate auto$-$failover from primary to secondary data center","Technology","High Availability","Medium","High","$400006182",$"Red Team","Raghu Karumuru","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Rejected$-$final","We have $10$ sites across the network that can serve LDAP data, applications that need to read or modify LDAP data can load balance between them for redundancy and automatic failover. It is up to the upstream application to implement this, not LDAP.","","","","",""

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_7",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Upgrade monitoring and alerting to resolve BAU process allowing offline issues","Technology","Observability","Medium","High","General","Red Team","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Rejected$-$final","Our monitoring did see the issue and alerted. Also appears to be a duplicate of line items $9$ and $10,$ we have already agreed to item $9$ assuming we are given the help we are asking for.","","","$6/24/24-$ Pavani $-$ Monitoring with HLA might address some of the concerns. Decide disposition based on the HLA implementation status

$7/26/24-$ Pavani $-$ HLA is not a viable candidate for this app.","",""

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_8",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Implement health check between clients daily","Technology","Observability","Small","High","General","Red Team","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Under Review","We do not have the ability to monitor from Azure. Requires the BBCATS team to either share their performance monitor alarms with our Tier $2$ and Tier $3$ teams, or we need to be given a space in Azure to run our own monitor.","","","On Hold pending BBCATS and $/$ or Azure assistance.

$06/24/24-$ YD$,$ Notified Peter","",""

$"26354","26354\_$LDAP$-$N$\_$FF$\_9",$"LDAP$-$N$",$"Improve problem isolation for troubleshooting to reduce propensity to bounce","Technology","Operational Recovery Process","Medium","High","$400006114",$"Red Team","","Michael Paradise $($mp$3247)",$"Org Name","VP Name","Rejected$-$final","Restarting an LDAP server is quick, low risk, and typically resolves most performance$-$related issues. It is also the first step our Tier $2$ teams take when a service issue is escalated to them.","","","Non Ready

Are there steps that the app team takes to figure out what the issue is before a bounce? In the case of this outage, it happened to be a known iss