p-value <0.001 and the fisher exact test = 0.0061, T-test=-9.338 , and df=56.208. this is the hypothesis and 2 predictions : There is a significant difference in the age since the last disturbance between Forest Region 1 and Forest Region 2. If the two forest regions differ in age since the last disturbance, the size of the largest hardwood trees will significantly vary between Forest Region 1 and Forest Region 2. If the two forest regions differ in age since the last disturbance, then the proportion of mature hardwoods relative to pines will significantly differ between Forest Region 1 and Forest Region 2. Begin by interpreting your results and drawing conclusions from them. You should explicitly discuss the descriptive statistics, the inferential statistic (p-value), whether the p-value is statistically significant, what the actual specific p-value means, how the inferential statistics and descriptive statsitics together relate to the relevant prediction. Do not forget to discuss the directionality of your data here (i.e. which region has the older trees/higher proportion of hardwoods to pines, or if there is no real difference). Put the interpretations of the two analyses together to address overall support for the hypothesis. Avoid using the words "believe" and "belief", "prove", "disprove" in science writing, as these words can have unclear and varied meanings to different readers. Instead of writing "I believe the results demonstrate," write "The results demonstrate