Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 9%. A-Z 0 1 2 3 4 Office 650 320 270 390 Project A Project B -1,000 -1,000 250 255 420 840 6 What is Project A's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. % What is Project B's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. NT % If the projects were independent, which project(s) would be accepted according to the IRR method? -Select- Neither Project A Project B Both projects A and B utually exclusive, which project(s) would be accepted according to the IRR method? If the projects were mutually exclusive, which project(s) would be accepted according to the IRR method? -Select- Neither Project A Project B Both projects A and B ct with project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches when projects are mutually exclusive? Could there be a conflict with project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches when projects are mutually exclusive? -Select- Yes No is-Select- The reason -Select- the NPV and IRR approaches use the same reinvestment rate assumption and so both approaches reach the same project acceptance when mutually exclusive projects are the NPV and IRR approaches use different reinvestment rate assumptions and so there can be a conflict in project acceptance when mutually exclusive projects are Reinvestmer the capital budgeting decision. Reinvestment at th the superior assumption, so when mutually exclusive projects are evaluated the -Select- v approach should be used for the capital budgeting -Select- IRR WACC decision