QUESTION $11$

It is sometimes possible to "pierce the corporate veil" and hold an owner of a corporation personally

liable for an act of the corporation or of an employee.

In order to do so$,$ which of the following must a plaintiff prove?

The corporation's actions amount to actual malpractice.

The owners of the corporation breached the medical code of ethics.

The owners used their control to commit fraud, violate a statute, or commit a dishonest or unjust act.

Corporate control was the proximate cause of the injury that is the subject of the suit.

The owners are the cause$-$in$-$fact of the injury that is the subject of the suit.

That allowing the owner of the corporation to escape liability would create a manifest injustice that

the law cannot allow.

The corporation's owners dominated it completely.

The corporate owners have failed to file taxes or other corporate reports with the applicable

authorities.