Question $14(1$ point$)$ When we can say because of what happened and how it happened, therefore negligence is the only logical explanation. The components of this doctrine are The injury is caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant. The injury$-$causing accident is not by any voluntary action or contribution on the part of the plaintiff The injury is plainly seen within $48$ hours of the occurance The injury is of the kind that does not ordinarily occur without negligence there was a superseding intervening cause in the inducement