Question $15$

$4\mathrm{.}38$ pts

Bob, a man who takes pride in his vehicle, decided to buy a brand new car lift. Bob wanted to lift his $5,000$lb$,1975$ Mustang, so that he can work on the car's bottom side. On the box of the car lift it states that it can easily lift up to $10,000lbs.$ The second day of using the car lift, the lift malfunctioned and the car fell on top of Bob. Bob has rushed to the hospital and spend months recovering from physical damages. In the middle of discovery, it was discovered that when designing the car lift the company decided to cut cost by using weaker metal instead of the high grade metal used by all the other companies. If Bob sues the company, what would be the easiest theory of torts to use?

$$ Strict Liability Tort while arguing Explosives

Negligence while arguing Negligence Per Se

Product Liability while arguing Manufacturing Defect

Breach of Contract while arguing Reasonably Useful and Safe

Strict Product Liability while arguing Design Defect