Question $1(5$ points$)$

Joseph Mulinaro used a state$-$owned vehicle for personal use that the Indiana Department of Correction had provided to him for work purposes. Mulinaro received a $2017$ Dodge Grand Caravan for him to use while traveling for state business during his tenure as a sales representative due to the excessive travel hours the job involved. Between November $2019$ and February $2023,$ Mulinaro drove his state vehicle for a total of $11,018\mathrm{.}5$ miles on weekends while he was not participating in work$-$related commitments and an additional $1,099\mathrm{.}5$ miles while on holiday. This brought the total calculated number of miles the former DOC employee drove to $12,118$ miles, which cost the state a loss of $$4,927\mathrm{.}50.$ Mullinaro has agreed to pay back the DOC after admitted his wrong$-$doing.

What type of scheme is this? Provide the overarching type of scheme as well as the specific sub$-$scheme.

Provide one control that could have helped prevent this.

Given an example of a pressure that might have led the fraudster to commit this crime $($different from your other short answer examples$).$

Give an example of a rationalization the fraudster might have used $($different from your other short answer examples$).$