Question $17(1$ point$)$

Mrs$.$ Stare was looking out her living room window when she saw her neighbour, Mr$.$ Phast, get in his new car and try to go from $0$ to $100$ kilometres per hour in just $10$ seconds, like the manufacturer's ad on TV$.$ It was a careless thing to do in this residential neighbourhood; Phast just missed hitting a child on his bike who was travelling in the same direction and couldn't see Phast's car coming. No one was hurt. Stare was angry at Phast's recklessness. On these facts, which of the following is false?

Phast owes a duty of care to the boy on the bike.

The boy could successfully sue Phast for negligence.

The test to be applied to determine the standard of care owed is the reasonable person test $($i$.$e$.,$ how a reasonable person would have driven the car$).$

Stare could not successfully sue Phast for negligence.