Question $19(1$ point$)$

Lillian walked into Neil's shoe store. Lillian told Neil, the owner of the store, that she planned to climb Mount Denali next month, and that she'd like some boots for that purpose. Neil selects the $x-9$ boots made by Woodpond, a company well$-$known for its boots. Neil made no comments about the boots. He simply told Lillian to try on the boots. Lillian bought the boots. Unknown to both Lillian and Neil, the X$-9$ boots are generally not used for mountain climbing, but only for hiking on relatively flat ground. In fact, the manufacturer's catalog specifically points out that the $x-9$ boots are not particularly suitable for mountain climbing. Lillian used the boots to climb Mount Denali. They did not provide the necessary support for her ankles and Lillian was severely injured. The injury would not have occurred had Lillian been hiking on flat ground. Has Neil breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose?

Yes, because Neil selected the $x-9$ boots.

No$,$ because Neil did not know about the manufacturer's recommendation concerning the boots.

No$,$ because Neil did not actually say anything about the boots.

No$,$ because mountain climbing is not the ordinary purpose for which these boots are normally used.