Question 1: Describe the legal philosophy(ies) towards the US Constitutional interpretation that is(are) espoused by the late Justice Scalia.

Question 2: Describe the possible consequences of courts using policy as the legal reasoning in an increased amount of court cases. What implications for society could occur?

Question 3: Given the rise of policy as legal reasoning espoused by recent court decisions, do you expect tradition to be used as legal reasoning in a large number future court decisions? Regardless of your stance in the matter, discuss possible changes that would result society if tradition is no longer followed as legal philosophy by the courts.

Essay: Identify and explain the types of legal reasoning used in the Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard. More than one type is present, in addition to the policy type. Also, advocate for a position whether you think that colleges should consider someone's race as a criterion for admission. In addition, advocate whether affirmative action should be used in college and graduate school admissions.