question 1

Develop a SWOT analysis for Walmart.

Specifically, have four paragraphs - one paragraph for each SWOT component which contains the following:

Identify at least two components of each SWOT component (e.g., identify at least two strengths, two weaknesses, ).

Explain why each identified component falls into the category it does (e.g., explain why strength #1 is considered a strength.)

In a final paragraph (this should be your 5th paragraph), identify one goal that Walmart can take advantage of based on their strengths. Explain.

question 2

Pretend you are Nathan and read the following scenario and answer questions a-e below the scenario:

Nathan Rosillo stared out his office window at the lazy curves and lush, green, flower-lined banks of the Dutch Valley River. Hed grown up near here, and he envisioned the day that his children would enjoy the river as he had as a child. But now his own company might make that a risky proposition.

Nathan is a key product developer at Chem-Tech Corporation, an industry leader. Despite its competitive position, Chem-Tech experienced several quarters of dismal financial performance. Nathan and his team developed a new lubricant product that the company sees as the turning point in its declining fortunes. Top executives are thrilled that they can produce the new product at a significant cost savings because of recent changes in environmental regulations. Regulatory agencies loosened requirements on reducing and recycling wastes, which means that Chem-Tech can now release waste directly into the Dutch Valley River.

Nathan is as eager as anyone to see Chem-Tech survive this economic downturn, but he doesnt think this route is the way to do it. He expressed his opposition regarding the waste dumping to both the plant manager and his direct supervisor, Martin Feldman. Martin has always supported Nathan, but this time was different. The plant manager, too, turned a deaf ear. Were meeting government standards, hed said. Its up to them to protect the water. Its up to us to make a profit and stay in business.

Frustrated and confused, Nathan turned away from the window, his prime office view mocking his inability to protect the river he loved. He knew that the manufacturing vice president was visiting the plant next week. Maybe if he talked with her, she would agree that the decision to dump waste materials in the river was ethically and socially irresponsible. But if she didnt, he would be skating on thin ice. His supervisor had already accused him of not being a team player. Maybe he should just be a passive bystanderafter all, the company isnt breaking any laws.

What would you do in this scenario?

How would this behavior (in answer a) be categorized related to the different ethical decision-making frameworks listed in section 4-3.

Explain why this is an example of this type of ethical decision-making framework.

Identify your go-to ethical decision-making framework from the frameworks listed in section 4-3. Review your week four reflection as you have already identified this.

Why is this your go-to ethical decision-making framework?

please answer both questions thoroughly as much details as you can and also support your answer with evidence.