Question: QUESTION 1 MONTHLY Expected Returns, Standard Deviations, and Correlations (1975-2014, 480 months), Portfolios are Top or Bottom Decile in Size or Book-to-Market Ratio Correlation with:

QUESTION 1

MONTHLY Expected Returns, Standard Deviations, and Correlations (1975-2014, 480 months), Portfolios are Top or Bottom Decile in Size or Book-to-Market Ratio

Correlation with:

Asset Class

Expected Return

Std. Deviation

Large Stocks

Small Stocks

Value Stocks

Growth Stocks

Gold

Large Stocks

1.01%

4.30%

1.00

0.65

0.75

0.93

-0.01

Small Stocks

1.35%

6.10%

0.65

1.00

0.75

0.69

0.07

Value Stocks

1.51%

5.94%

0.75

0.75

1.00

0.65

0.01

Growth Stocks

0.95%

5.13%

0.93

0.69

0.65

1.00

0.00

Gold

0.54%

5.66%

-0.01

0.07

0.01

0.00

1.00

1. Suppose you CAN short assets at no extra cost (so weights can be negative).

A. Find the portfolio that maximizes expected return if you want the same risk of LARGE stocks. What are the portfolio weights?

B. Which asset do you SHORT in this portfolio? What asset has the biggest increase in portfolio weight from the CANNOT short to CAN short examples? Why?

C. Consider the portfolios you found that maximize expected returns subject to having the same risk as LARGE stocks. What is the benefit in terms of expected returns, in being able to SHORT assets vs. not being able to SHORT assets? Given this benefit, is allowing the investor to SHORT important in this example?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!