Question: QUESTION 1 MONTHLY Expected Returns, Standard Deviations, and Correlations (1975-2014, 480 months), Portfolios are Top or Bottom Decile in Size or Book-to-Market Ratio Correlation with:
QUESTION 1
|
MONTHLY Expected Returns, Standard Deviations, and Correlations (1975-2014, 480 months), Portfolios are Top or Bottom Decile in Size or Book-to-Market Ratio | |||||||
|
|
|
| Correlation with: | ||||
| Asset Class | Expected Return | Std. Deviation | Large Stocks | Small Stocks | Value Stocks | Growth Stocks | Gold |
| Large Stocks | 1.01% | 4.30% | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.93 | -0.01 |
| Small Stocks | 1.35% | 6.10% | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.07 |
| Value Stocks | 1.51% | 5.94% | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.01 |
| Growth Stocks | 0.95% | 5.13% | 0.93 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Gold | 0.54% | 5.66% | -0.01 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
1. Suppose you CAN short assets at no extra cost (so weights can be negative).
A. Find the portfolio that maximizes expected return if you want the same risk of LARGE stocks. What are the portfolio weights?
B. Which asset do you SHORT in this portfolio? What asset has the biggest increase in portfolio weight from the CANNOT short to CAN short examples? Why?
C. Consider the portfolios you found that maximize expected returns subject to having the same risk as LARGE stocks. What is the benefit in terms of expected returns, in being able to SHORT assets vs. not being able to SHORT assets? Given this benefit, is allowing the investor to SHORT important in this example?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
